Sputnik


so, basically, 6 series and 2 singles is an indication i,e +1, then bet for this change to continue.


Bet a single will occur.


its not red, or black, its series or singles.


its not bet red, or bet black, its bet for a single (that could be red if the +1 indication was  black) or red if the indication was red.


or in the case of 22222211, or RRBBBRRBBBBRRBBRB....it would be red
In the case of 11111122 or RBRBRBRRBBBR...it would be Red.


if that's right, I will do a back somersault for you

Sputnik.....
I've been tracking all 3 EC.....tendancy +1 seems to be working in one of them..say h/l....where you would of been sat around waiting if only looking at RB. Have you tried this?

The post was for people who believe in single and series ideas to help me understand these ideas. I don't need it proving or disproving. Ego and others have been most generous and I don't want them to shy away from my post.. Im just starting to get somewhere. Perhaps start a new post

So not so different to the basic theory behind GUT

I agree ...for what I know. High SD is very visible in small samples using singles and series. Still...I get 9 singles and one series and the singles keep coming. This is where I am stuck.

ND....i just caught the article by accident. It challenges your perception of numbers.
I found it fun.
As for the DZ infidels....i heard a lot of DZ players have hairy palms and 6 fingers on one hand.
don't know how true that is?!?

EGO...so you would play for a 2 series to appear if you could see recent results showed 5 single vs 2 or say 8 vs 4 from the chart.
You would be expecting another repeat of ec to balance the + SD

Quote from: Sputnik on September 01, 2013, 10:23:54 AM
Lets pick a playing model first based upon math and probability.

Singles has the value of 1
Series of two has the value of 0
Series of three has the value of 1
Series of four has the value of 2
Series of five has the value of 3
Series of six has the value of 4
Series of seven has the value of 5
Series of eight has the value of 6
And so it continues ...

Now singles and series of three has a 50/50 situation with the value of 1 each.
Assume now you get a window of event with imbalance where singles only show with just one or two series of three.
Lets say you get a window of 14 singles and 2 series of three.
That is a STD or Ecart of 3.0 and a very strong imbalance.

Ego.....Im researching and have now hit a crossroads.


In 2011....you said something very similar, but different.


I have to resolve the differences to further my study


you said


Series of two contra higher series.
The valuse for each event is as follows.
singles has the value of 0 
Series of two has the value of 1
Series of three has the value of 0
Series of four has the value of 1
Series of five has the value of 2
Series of six has the value of 3
Series of seven has the value of 4
And so it continues ...

Here we skip singles and series of three as we aim to only capture longer series and the overrepresented events has to be series of two and the imbalance has to hit a bench mark of 3.0 STD before we can wait for the underrepresented events to show and try to gain at least +1 unit - using a specific march.

I appreciate your replies people.


don't know how many play craps, but its similar (but more complex) than dice probability, which I understand.


The Marigny de grilleau post by Ego, I posted on many months ago. It was simply an image of an exploding head cartoon.


I shall revisit this post now I've actually understood what series are.


i never get anything unless I see it for myself....like this....
100 spins, OE


OK...its obvious singles are more than 2 series, but after that, it's a bit "I didn't expect that"


with such variance, how can you be sure? HOW COULD YOU PLAY THESE NUMBERS AS O/E?


Series of 1 = 17
Series of 2 = 12
Series of 3 = 2
Series of 4 = 0
Series of 5 = 2
Series of 6 = 2
Series of 8 = 0
Series of 9 = 0
Series of 10 = 0
Series of 11 = 1


23 2
31 2..
36 1
0
21 2
11 2..
16 2
18 2..
25 2
7   2..
22 1
29 7
13 7
21 7
25 7
25 7
5   7
11 7.....
24 1
25 3
23 3
5   3...
6   2
2   2...
21 1
36 1
23 6
17 6
7   6
5   6
21 6
5   6....
30 1
25 1
8   1
9   2
11 2....
32 2
36 2...
0
31 6
3   6
33  6
11  6
25 6
13 6.....
4  2
20 2..
11 2
25 2....
14 1
7   1
2   5
34 5
10 5
4  5
4  5....
29 2
25 2..
3
0
28 1
31 1
22 3
12 3
4   3....
1  1
6  5
12 5
10 5
2   5
4   5...
17 6
3  6
27 6
5   6
15 6
21 6.....
10 2
14 2...
25 1
14 1
35 1
34 2
6   2...
31 1
28 11
22 11
26 11
2   11
28  11
24  11
18  11
26  11
20  11
24  11
11

Skakus....cheers...this is what i wanted.


I'd rather see a worthless losing idea than just hear someone tell me they have the answer with no explaination


Hence, this subject.


So you bet with the wheel basically?

Ok....the mystical "could tell you but then I would have to kill you" subject.

EC series.

It seems that if you study this...you feel you have done some kind of SAS training, and can't tell anyone.

They have to go into the labyrinth themselves and find out the hard way...like the Masons or Rosicrucians

I don't know what the reason for this rite of passage is...

OK.............
R or B is statistically most likely to happen. This is a series of 1. (RBRB)
Over many spins, you will see 25%

RR or BB 12%.....series of 2

RRR or BBB 6.25% series of 3

RRRR or BBBB 3.1% series of 4

You can see where this is going

RRRRRR (rare, 0.8%) BBBBB?
So another black and and a consecutive 6 series is rare, so bet red, and it continues BBBBB....and the chance of that is 0.05% (series of 10)

So what do we do with this knowledge?

RRBBRRB    bet red to "stop the trend"...or another way of putting it, bet red because a single series is much more probable than another 2 series....and it goes BBBBBB.

Throws in another even less probable series of 7

What I would like someone to explain is how we use these series statistics to place bets.

THIS IS WHAT I DON'T GET

Well...I get it, but it just doesn't seem to do what's expected (variance of course)


Turner

Skakus....its not.


Not everyone is going through a productive phase and needs help to change that situation....like Astrix asked.


Im sure astrix will of felt better from the help. One thing he wouldn't want is a story about how well someone is doing...full stop.


I agree with you. I think a "heres what I made" story should be backed up with "and heres how I did it" justification or ...as you say...its just bragging. worse than that, its trying to make people think you are great. it works in Junior school i think, but not in adult company.


It just causes resentment.

I turned a free no wager bonus of £20 into £48 last month. I've been plucking up courage to tell you all and felt now was a good time. Took me 4 minutes.


was William Hill.....which was nice


Happy days !

Yes....10 is dublin bet marque...that's all. Could be 12...16..
If it works it works on any....ties in with a 33u stop loss also..wcs being no hits or new repeat in 10.

Needs testing/tweaking ofcourse....perhaps bet 4 times and wait....dunno yet...but the theory is worthy due to Skakus extensive study

Last 10.....latest repeat + 2 carpet neighbours....3 numbers
Play until the repeat leaves the 10....or new latest repeat. Flat bet. Very interesting