Lets hope its not a damp squib 



[Moderator's Note:  Post reinstated. An innocent pun -- no harm intended! ]

Its shrodingers birthay today

The only problem with TV science like Horizon etc is that they have 3 mins of new info and stretch it out into 1 hour with long corridor shots and massive telescope doors opening for 4 mins...interviews with scientific talking heads...and the long stare shots when introducing a new talking head. Goes on for ages.

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on August 11, 2013, 01:24:57 AM
I'm colour blind. I can't see green, so I voted indifferent. 

Skakus
How much did you spend on lawn treatments until you realised?

Quote from: D1 on August 10, 2013, 04:27:48 PM
Leave them there for the members that make donations but remove them for everyone else

And what about people who donated and think they suck?....like me lol

@number 6
your post to priyanka


I agree with you...love the comment "really just a posh way of looking for conditions" for the regression to mean boys, hilarious!


I prefer Esoteric...to posh


but it doesn't leave us with much does it? other than a bunch of fallacies


What should we be doing then?...in your opinion

Sam....Lloyds TSB Bank UK announced a bad year....only made 1.5 Billion profit....1 billion down


Same thing.

Oooooh matron!!!

On the other note....does one of the last 6 unique numbers often repeat because its the hottest group of 6 on the planet?

Speaking of Turner

http://betselection.cc/gambling-philosophy/random-thoughts/msg18029/#msg18029

http://betselection.cc/straight-up/three-way-mirror-idea-flat-betting-between-3-and-12-numbers/msg18072/#msg18072

Sam...


I think your videos are a treat to watch


Long may you reign as the purveyor of excellent "idea explanation"

Sam,


i think Casualty is the correct name for it.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality_(physics)

Perhaps im not sure what im trying to say. But i know what im trying to do
Im trying to understand if random has limits and what they are.
Its better to test yourself than just believe a list some one else produced.

But a line is just one combination of 6 numbers that can exist in 37.
So 123456 is special and 123457 is completly different until I get to 7,8,9,10,11,12
Then its special again.?

Quote from: Priyanka on August 05, 2013, 11:24:07 AM

I think one more question that crossed my mind is what is the optimum that you should look for. I am thinking may be a line may not sleep 85 times for every session you play. Do you have any views Turner on how frequent this appeared on your tests? I mean out of lets say 10 sets of 85 spins, how many of them had a line sleeping for 85 spins.. In my tests I figured out that 5 numbers sleeping for 85 is very common but not 6.

There are 2.3 million 6's in 37 defined by (37!/6!)/31! = 2,324,784
Now its quite clear that ,say,line 1 comes out seemingly many time in our short viewing, that 12 million spins of data just isn't enough to show all 2.3M 6's hit max. Some will hit a lot...re:93..but its not the max.
perhaps there isn't a max


Lines show as a number sequence or 6 consecutive numbers that the casino decided to mark out.


Now the confusion to me isn't why I am seeing 6 numbers (which a line simply is) showing 105...higher than the 12 mill data, but why i am seeing them readily without looking extensivly.


if I blandly find 6 sleepers in say 95 spins, it then doesn't hit for 6 spins which is 101.


Im not lucky. Sleepers showing are the extremes of sleeps instantly showing all the time.


Yes Im obsessing...no Im not bloviating (to quote Sam) ....yes Im missing apostrophes Sam


But why do groups of sleepers show as a "yet to be discovered" maximum highs, all the time, in minutes of testing.


Perhaps we would need 100Million spins to see a line get to 101..


But I can see 103, 105 sleeps for 6 numbers in a matter of minuets


The answer to your question is that I have never seen a line sleep more than 40 in hours of testing


I've seen other 6's sleep 103 in minutes.


If RX could show 6's....it would need 2.3 million lines of data, and perhaps, in 12 million spins, the max may be 200