Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Turner

#406
sorry...tidied it up
#407
I did a lot of testing last night....nearly blew my laptop up running 1000000 spins thro RXI settled for 1/2 million as it was burning my leg. All bet positions have a max they sleep for.
They aren't a surprise.
Max sleepsingle
no.        1   471
split      2   270
street   3   161   
corner   4   111
line      6   71 
Doz       12  36
e/c        18  22
5)   94?           
7)   67?             
8   58?           
9)   52           
10)  47?           
11)  29?

The 5 to 9 with a ? are a guess from the observed above that.
Now....I set Rx to the predetermined  figures and found that number of sleepers
Say...lines...I set to track 71, found 6 sleeping and increased it until it was 5 sleeping not 6.

I found 6 that were still sleeping at 95 spins....went to 5 at 96.
I am certain by projecting my test in theory to 5 million spins...or 10 million that a figure around 95 would show.
But You may say...well that's 20 years of spins, I can discount it.Well no, because i found one in 5 mins.

I also found 31 sleeps for 18 numbers.
A safe rule of thumb would be to times the 400K figures by 1.5.
You won't be far out....and I observed some of them with my own eyes.

Max sleep
singleno's 1   706
split        2    390
street     3    241
corner     4   166
line         6   106
Doz        12  54
e/c        18  33

And I did see a 4 sleeping when I was testing for streets ay 166!!...i did see an 18 sleep for 31 and a 6 sleep for 95

So i have actually seen some of these predictions.
Conclusion.
These maximum sleeps are showing all the time.You could be betting 6 numbers and not realize its about to sleep for 95
SO I set the tracker for 85 and soon enough a sleep of 6 showed.
I bet them on RX and one number showed in the next 7 spins, many times on different sets of numbers.





[Mod Note....edited so preventing eye strain!......much better, thank mate! [smiley]aes/thumb.png[/smiley]]
#408
I don't like too before testing. But it would intetest John Legend.
I can't accuse someone of not contributing then keep something to myself...but im in the house alone tonight....ill come back tomorrow.
Its very doable too...and will prove something or put it to bed
Also....i need to generate and run a few million spins in rx.
#409
Quote from: Turner on August 02, 2013, 12:54:11 PM
Maths can be fun....agreed.....but i had 20 runs of 10k and every street, line, ec had the same max sleep.....street being near to 100. Maths dosnt denote where in that cycle you are as you place yer chip.
Bit like being told to stand on a trapdoor covering a pit of wooden spikes. You know it opens once a day at the same precise time...but no one seems to know when it last opened....do you get on it?
Depressingly...every bet selection is a group somewhere in the scheme of thing....even 1, 15, 36
Even if one is just off on a 345 spin sleep...collectively...it could sleep for 110....and you just chose it at random
I've just had an idea....and its in my post....thought of it by reading my own post...lol
#410
Maths can be fun....agreed.....but i had 20 runs of 10k and every street, line, ec had the same max sleep.....street being near to 100. Maths dosnt denote where in that cycle you are as you place yer chip.
Bit like being told to stand on a trapdoor covering a pit of wooden spikes. You know it opens once a day at the same precise time...but no one seems to know when it last opened....do you get on it?
Depressingly...every bet selection is a group somewhere in the scheme of thing....even 1, 15, 36
Even if one is just off on a 345 spin sleep...collectively...it could sleep for 110....and you just chose it at random
#411
I did degree level maths in my HND electronics and electrocal engineering. I suck at maths and probability. I've tried reading Bayes and it sounds like the teacher in charlie brown.....a slighty muted trumpet played by a 3 year old
#412
General Discussion / Re: Dublin bet
August 01, 2013, 10:38:28 PM
Both ideas are good actually...cheers gents
#413
General Discussion / Dublin bet
August 01, 2013, 09:34:21 PM
Hello...i recently joined realplay at Dublinbet and since then Icant find any way to play freeplay.


I am baffled...


I just end up in real play every time.
#414
Dane.....there's no can't or can...just not seen it or seen it.
I have seen a street sleep 110 spins....so I know they can from observation. I can't say it's a limit but  i can say it could sleep 110.

In theory....if someone asked me if my mother can break dance....the answer is no. The real answer is I have never seen her break dance.
No one can say random has limits....unless they have seen every run ever produced. Even then...you haven't seen tomorrows.
#415
But you have me thinking.
What about generating 12 random 3's each session
Rand.org.....sequences...1-36.....12 columns.c
#416
You get a feel for these things.
The exact same can be done with streets.
It would make no difference.
A street can sleep for 80?....can't remember exactly

#417
Straight-up / Re: Straights and trends
August 01, 2013, 08:22:22 AM
The latvian dolly dealer mantra...."  sorry to hear that player....results are random"  ^-^
#418
Straight-up / Re: Straights and trends
July 31, 2013, 10:08:15 PM
latvian spins would be nice to look at. how many X's from where the ball flew off....12 ?  lol
#419
Gambling Philosophy / Re: Random thoughts
July 31, 2013, 11:45:09 AM
Flat...yes.that one. just a test of bet selection vs 4 random choices. No point to be made just seeing if the  excellant delambert held up to anything

#420
Gambling Philosophy / Re: Random thoughts
July 31, 2013, 09:50:30 AM
just out of intetest...I went through flatinos file with a bet selection of 4 random choices from 6 instead of his for/against. Same  betting cycles exactly. It won more with less drawdowns. The progression was the power in this case. haven't repeated the exercise so its still spurious.