Atlantis....btw....all 70 was a mix of 10p and 50p....and bread and butter....but the last 30 was a slightly unrralistic "The Edge". ....i was lucky to never go past 5 steps in 20 sessions.
I meant the result was unrealistic, not the edge.
B&B or Coocoon....more like £40.

Atlantis....like all good scientists....i need more testing

...however...GG has said it solid....and works best perhaps with coocoon.

Im not a giddy man...but I trust GGs thumbs up. This is encouraged me
I got to £87 from a free fiver (10 of that is some stupid wagered bonus...so 77). But...the wife wanted things doing...and i some how placed £10 for 10p...and it was RNG...which is against my religion.so ot went a bit tits up.

I've transfered to live table....and haven't lost a session yet. 50p is my 1u. it's a tad slower.

Personally...its the best bet selection i have produced....for sure

First...it was me who said there arnt any corner systems.....i can agree with ND on the first glance being "it's a loser"....paying no respect to trends or HE.
Its good to post it tho because something you don't like can be a good refresher of things you do

Thanks Chris,


Ill keep to my cycle labby style (ala Flatino) for a few tests, and see if some of the longer losses cope better by stretching the losses out rather than a neg progression per se. Ill try this later if the hit rate keeps up like it is. Quicker wins with the neg prog though
that's the key I guess, to which progression to use....hitrate.


I've attached a session with explanation

Quad cycle
This has worked well for me in testing, and I currently have turned a free £5-00 no rules bonus on 21Nova into £26 @10p stakes....Comments are most welcome. It doesn't feel complete yet.
Bet selection is in the form of 3 streets to make a quad of the table
4 groups: 1,2,3,4 (1-9     10-18     19-27    28-36)
Playing the groups as 3 Streets 1) 1,2,3     2) 4,5,6    3) 7,8,9   4) 10,11,12
Zero is ignored or treated as a non hit.
Track until  all groups have hit at least once.
We track like this: *=last to hit so all have hit
1-9          111
10-18     11
19-27    1111
28-36    1*
We track until all groups are hit, and when the last group hits (28-36 in this case) we have a choice:
We would like to bet the hottest on hitting of all the 4 groups if we have 8 or 9 or less hits
If we have a qualification of 14, 15 or so, we may of passed the trend, and will use the re-appearing sleeper.
.........................................................
Ex.1)
1-9          1
10-18     11
19-27    1*
28-36    1
Ex.1 This is perfect. A trend in 5 spins. We defiantly bet 10-18 .
..................................................
Ex.2)
1-9          111
10-18     11111
19-27    1111111
28-36    1*
Ex.2) 16 hits to trigger is past any trend. I have been playing the newly hit group (*) as a returning sleeper
..........................................................
Ex.3)
1-9          11
10-18     1*
19-27    11
28-36    1
Ex.3 I don't play as there is no trend in one group over a short run .
......................................................................
Ex.4)
1-9          1*
10-18     1
19-27    1
28-36    1
Retrack
...................................................................
Ex.5)
1-9          11
10-18     11
19-27    1*
28-36    111
Ex.5) play group 4.

Progression....I am weak at.
I am playing 3 hit cycles
EX.6
1-9          11
10-18     1
19-27    111
28-36    1*
Playing group 3 by means of 1u street 9, 1u 8, 1u 7
1-1-1, 1-1-1, 1-1-1.
2-2-2,-2-W
If we are on a new high. Retrack and 1-1-1.
If we are down or even, stay at 2-2-2
To pass 3-3-3 with the same bet has no relevance as the trigger didn't work this time. With the high hit rate, Its best to retrack and start 4-4-4 or quit.
I've been here ten or so times in around 100 sessions.

I didn't comment because its pretty much Turbo123 by TurboGenius and I tested ot to death years ago

Quote from: spike on June 14, 2013, 08:53:59 PM
And its sine-wave, not
sign-wave.

sinusoidal if you want to be picky...

Quote from: GreatGrampa on June 13, 2013, 07:52:15 PM

According to me, there is no harm in using static unchanging bet selections. You just need to use virtual bets to wait for the trend on the table to catch your selection, especially when you are covering most of the table.

On long run, both static and unstatic selections will have the same hit ratio, when the coverage is huge.

Yes....but then its not unchanging anymore. You are using virtual wins. I mean never changing...bet every spin, is bad

No offense meant. I liked the 9 selections idea. RO, RE,BO,BE,


You should look at that further.


I was trying similar with OH,OL,EH,EL....

Come on Ignatus....you know this is too static...you know this falls foul to the house edge....you know you have to catch the up and not the down, without knowing where these are.


I've enjoyed some of your recent posts....you know this is poor.


You know it will do this (attached)


If I jump on at 0 spins, pavements of gold....if I jump on at 150 spins, road to hell!!!


Keep trying....but forget static unchanging bet selections.


[attachimg=1]


[attachimg=2]

Well seeing as you are a LEGEND, King Arthur, I'm backing you to bounce back. 
I like the "humility"angle....well thought through.

Chris...dgt is RX file. It will run. I wouldn't touch any of it. Your life was good yesterday before you saw these

I had a friend who went to the states...Georgia, I think...and he was staying with family.
he hired a car one day, and was pulled over by the police. They let him on his way after a few checks.


When he got back, he told the folks he was stopping with..... that the police officer seemed disabled, like all bent up as he stood at the side of the car. They said "was he stood like this?"...and did a pose.
He said..."Yes....just like that....feet way back, and bent forward."


They said...."Oh that's so you can't shoot him through the door."


that's a real fecking shock to hear that..... as someone from England.

Quote from: TwoCatSam on June 07, 2013, 12:38:49 PM

The Preacher went to see the movie, "The Life Of Brian" and told us, "I have seen the movie; you don't need to."  I immediately went to see the movie. 


Sam

it's a line out the movie you went to see Sam....as Bayes said


(And I quoted it wrong.....its Messiah, not Son of God)


Python fans tend to do a lot of Python quoting.


Anyhow.......

Quote from: NathanDetroit on June 07, 2013, 04:38:21 PM
Izak`s  e-mail was filtered into my spam folder and it  met the same  fate as all   the rest  : summarily deleted.


ND

lol ND...."the voice of reason! "

I mentally filtered it into the recycle bin in my head after reading the first few lines of the first post.

Dear Let's Talk Winning subscribers, customers, friends,
People often ask me if there was only one system I would use to make consistent profits, which one would it be?  I have developed so far 56 systems and I usually use multiple systems of mine, but if there is one system that I keep coming back to it year after year, I can tell confidently that this is the one:   It is my own Holy Grail. <<<<<<<Here is the actual moment I rang the bell on Izaks bus and asked his driver to let me off