XXVV.
what is your view on the result from Bayes test using my numbers?

Bayes.
Taking my spins and method of extraction...do you feel they are more reliable or fall foul of the same issues. (obviously the hand written issue is elliminated)

As sputnik put it... The graph shows good days....bad days and average days
Having said that.... I wouldn't of minded being on table 2 in June and over christmas

XXVV....as a man of my word...I haven't even seen the contents of this file.


I hope Bayes can run it.


It's a file of integrity......as far as I trust RX to do the work for me (Yes...I am trying to trust something on face value....not like me at all)

Bayes.....a verified set of spins

I have noticed something


In RX....if you download spins from a casino, it does 1 table at a time.


So I set the time to several months and one continuous file. (see attachment)


Also, as long as I cut off the download before todays date, I have a massive spin file from 1 casino and 1 table.


(see attachment)


Attached is a notepad file (weus20130205_20140212_2.txt) with 30K spins from table 2 Spielbank Wiesbaden Casino May2013-Jan2014


Pretty verified if you ask me


(if I set to 2010 or so, I would get 1M spins from table 2)

All very interesting....and debated perfectly in my view
@ bayes
Thanks for the explaination

This is my problem. I get a bit confused. I always hate those films that split screen and have several camera shots at once.


There seem to be a lot of versions of this idea. Is egos version different than Bayes version different than XXVVs version?


There are several postes all on WF3


I seem to remember a max of spins that ends a game, as well as a 4th repeat or a win.


Which is which??

Bally...Im shocked at the interest this idea has gathered considering that I've been playing like this and posting like this for years.
Having said that...the subtlty lies in the application.

Sputnik......


Well, when I was testing this on RX, It didn't bother me if I was playing 12 or 13. I was testing it.


But when I play it on DB or in a land casino, I feel the big selections are hard to place fast, and are risky.


I've limited it to 5,6,7 perhaps.....anything bigger, I use as a trigger change (but don't play it)


Call it a VB ?


A bit like 22,22 would stop things dead.


Wait for something smaller.


....I find playing warm numbers during repeating fluctuations interesting.


Every once hit number is potentially on its way 








If I have casino money, I would do same for 22, 3,6, 22 ( play 22,3,6)

Quote from: iggiv on February 14, 2014, 06:45:30 PM
Small Republic of Belarus with population of less than 10 million took a third gold and overtook Russia, China, France and UK. I am not even talking about Switzerland achievement now, which is sensation itself.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/winter-olympics/2014/medals/countries/australia

(Ahem!) Britain god a gold in the skeleton ! We don't win anything in the winter Olympics.

Thanks Xander....this is instructive 

Quote from: Xander on February 13, 2014, 10:40:11 PM
I don't see how to post graphs from Excel Spreadshets.   

click choose file...simple

Quote from: Xander on February 13, 2014, 09:26:44 PMTurner,It will slightly reduce the house edge on some live wheels for reasons that most people will not understand.  The physics involved are outside of what the ordinary gambler can grasp.

That's just esoteric and helps nobody


Just because you type yourself an impressive CV doesn't answer the question


So if I have 100000 spins from random.org and 100000 spins from live wheel, what will the differences be.


I've tested them and noticed that they are same from a hit point of view.


Red hits 18, 19 in a row, all numbers have a period of hitting many times (4 in a row), all numbers sleep for 400+ etc


no discernible difference


There are the results and conclusions of my testing.


What is your angle?

Quote from: Xander on February 13, 2014, 07:22:39 PMNOT.     There's no logical reason for it.  Besides, I've already tested RNG in the past.  It's a waste of time.The only reason betting the hottest number cuts the edge slightly is because of a slight bias that can exist with the dealer/wheel combination.

So basically, RNG doesn't have hot numbers and real wheel does because the wheel is wonky or there is "debris"in the pocket...or it's a bit humid or the dealer eat a cake and didn't wash his hands?

Keep going XXVV. Im enjoying your stuff.
Turner