Weddings

I get your point.  You have beaten the game.  I salute you.  You choose to keep secret the method you use.  I respect your decision.

What I do not respect is a bunch of bloviation with absolutely nothing to back it up.  If this thing is so great--AND YOU WANT TO PREACH ABOUT IT--then show us how it works.

Sam

Greetings!

You say all this hooey from Kimo Li works.  Well, let's prove it to the world.  You have written 10,000 words trying to explain this to the forum.

I challenge you to do this:  Tell me exactly how you would bet on UNKNOWN numbers, and I will log onto Dublin or SmartLive (your choice) and make a movie playing EXACTLY as you say to play. 

I have the books and I can look up what a "star" is again, but I'd rather you put it into your own words so there is no mistake.

What say you?

Sam

6

I cannot disagree with a thing you said.  I can only quote Robert Browning:  "Ah, but a man's reach must exceed his grasp or what's a heaven for?"

So we plod along......

Sam

I will freely admit I have had systems I thought were infallible.I was wrong.I have had systems that worked for so long,I thought they would never fail.I was wrong. 

Years ago I studied a system while my wife was undergoing physical therapy.  Sitting in the car,I did 5,000 spins, 100 at a time.  (OK, some I did at home.)  This system never failed to produce a profit.I then went to CasinoWebCam and played the system.I took $300 to over $3,200 before they discovered I was an American and shut me down.I also tried this system at several other casinos and it worked.

I thought this system was the be-all and end-all.  It wasn't. 

It seems to work best on a John Huxley Starburst wheel.  Dublin has one through their associate.  When I got an account at Dublin,I tried the system.  It failed.

So if you can do 5,000 dummy spins and win and then actually win $2,900 and have something fail, what is there?  When you can win money at three casinos with a system and then have it fail, what is there to say? You were on a lucky streak?

All I have learned in the past seven years has not brought me one inch closer to winning long term.

I don't know where that "follow him" statement came from or if it was about me but if it was--take some friendly advice:  Don't follow me!

[Moderator's Comment:  To stop you thinking you're going nuts (LOLOL) the 'follow him' was part of an abrupt reply from one member to another in one of the posts that has since been deleted.  So relax -- no need to change your medication after all! ]

Sam

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on December 10, 2013, 12:13:39 AM
My apologies to Wannawin for adding fuel to the fire.

If I play roulette on a daily basis and always leave the table with some profit, and I do so for 20 years or more, and then I retire to live out my remaining days with an accumulated fortune at my disposal, would you say I have beaten the game of roulette?

Or did I only win because I knew when to leave the table?

MBB

Are you saying:  "Hypothetically I did x, y and z.", or are you saying you have actually done this? 

I read you saying you have never left the table a loser in 20 years.  Are you making that as a factual statement?

Just curious.....

Sam

When "weddings" has a forum, I'll join.  His screen shot knocked me cold!

The above statement assumes that you will be ahead more times than you are behind. 

That is to say:

"I am going to quit when I am up $10".  OK, how do you get up $10.00?  How do you keep from going straight down?

There is an old saying, something like this:  At some point in his game, every player is ahead.

Is that true?  Do we believe that?

This is a great topic for discussion.  Thanks, ww.

Sam

Carrie

I am always available for testing things.  I am twocatsam [at] cox [dot] net

As always, I am discreet.

Sam

[I edited your email address, mate. Left as it was spam email-harvesters would have found it, and your inbox would suffer greatly! esoito]

Quote from: NathanDetroit on November 29, 2013, 01:00:56 AM
Mr.J`s method requires  TIME , MONEY, and TEFLON  B...s.


Would anyone please step forward and truthfully state that he  has  played Mr. J`s method  at a   B & M Casino , Live dealer at live wheel. .




It does not need be  a winning session. Just a TR .






ND>

ND

I fully realize what I'm about to say does not answer your question.  Frankly, I wish I had the guts to truly play this system.  It's called "Two's Company".

I learned this system by asking Mr. J questions and reading his posts.  He was most gracious, but now he's tired and hates to re-hash it.  (I'm not!)

I took the Zuma tester and went until I had a $5,000 profit and just quit.  It does not win every session, but in the long run it does win.  My opinion only.

I have hoped that when America gets on-line gambling I can find a 00 casino and try it for real.  I could do it on the RNG at Riverwind and may, in fact.

I will not go to Vegas or Kansas City just to test this.

Sam

Gents

Who would set the auto-spin feature at BV for red and play for a year in hopes of breaking even or only losing 2.7%?  Where's the excitement in that?

A better thought is to just give this gambling thing the boot and loose nothing. 

I did make a mistake on my calculations:  I have lost 400 Euro and 100 dollars.  (Forgot SmartLive.)

When I say "I'm getting closer", I am considering where I once was.  Bayes and Superman are in a class by themselves.  They don't lose.  I hold no envy for their success; I only want to join them.


Sam

Consistantly Profitable Bet---------That is the phrase we've been searching for.

In 2013 I have run thousands upon thousands of dollars through the windows and only lost around 400 Euro.  Before you laugh, let's see you run 10,000 through the mill and come back with 9,600.  I am getting closer!

Sam

No, Marshall, when you post it, I'll be there. 

Oh, the things I've tried!!!


And, no, Buffster,  I don't have mine.

Sam

Hey

We all know the wolf story.

Imagine a collective of seekers we shall call Johnny.  Johnny is thousands.  Every now and then a Johnny cries "Holy Grail" and the crowd runs to see what he's got.  Nothing.  So, after a while, the crowd doesn't even run.  The collective Johnny has fooled them once to many times.

Now that Johnny has destroyed his credability (Obama) no one believes him.  What if a Johnny truly had the "Holy Grail" and no one listened?

Think about it

The "Holy Grail" is merely a bottable idea/system/method that wins more than it loses over time.

Where's Ignatus??

Sam

Bally

In the book I have, he absolutely does use a progression, so there must be a new edition.

Sam

With roulette, every spin has the same chance of hitting 10.  With Back-A-Rat, when the first 10 is shown, there is an infinitesimally smaller chance of getting another 10.  And smaller.  And smaller.

Deep into the shoe, there may be only 3 10s left.

Or I could be all wet...

Sam