Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - TwoCatSam

#466
OK, Chris

Here is a screen shot.  I don't know how to make it scroll. But if you look at today, June 1st, you will see I earned around 90 Euro.  On the way to doing that I lost a ton of bets, so it's no "Holy Grail".

I earned this money while cleaning up my yard after a storm and while walking the dogs.  It took about a total of ten minutes to set the bot each four times I ran it.

That last hit for around 31 Euro---that is a "bonus hit".  It is supposed to win 11.2 Euro, but sometimes the stars align just perfectly and it does that before the bot shuts down.

Now--if BV were cheating, would they let that happen?

I'm off to chow down on Mexican food!

Samster
#467
Off-topic / Re: Nice for some eh!
June 01, 2013, 11:37:52 PM
Waterspouts?  Pish-Tosh!!  Had one of those over my cup of tea last week!!
#468
Vic

You are right.  You once said the "Holy Grail" returned your investment plus one unit.  I'll never forget that.  As to the draw downs--a.k.a. dispersion---that is the bane of all players.  The paltry house take is virtually meaningless.  Who ever leaves a casino saying, "Wow!!  I lost 2.7% today!!"

Chris

The bots are doing well.  As soon as it finishes this game, I will pull up the stats and post them.  Here's the thing:  This bot is set to win 11.2 Euro per game.  On the way to doing that, it will literally lose thousands of bets.  About ten bets net is what it takes to win.  So if it runs three hours at one bet per ten seconds---well, do the math.

So the "Holy Grailist" could laugh and say, "Wow, you only win ten bets out of five thousand!!  What a loser!!"  But this loser has gone up 300 Euro this week doing just that.

TwoCat
#469
I once heard it said:  Good is the enemy of perfect.  That is, quit at good and you'll never be perfect. You know, sometimes that true.  If our own Shannon Miller had quit at good, she would not be the Olympic champion she is today.  How many others could we say the same thing about?  Hundreds......

But perfect is illusive.  It's like Nirvana.  Maybe it only exists for a few.  Buffet says most are the oyster; few are the pearl.  With me?

How many of you are passing up a money making system--one that loses occasionally but wins in the long run--to find that bet that never loses?  Why do you want that bet that never loses?  Why not be happy with a bet that plods along like a tortoise and beats the hare at the finish line?

Just another TwoCat Ramble...

Sam
#470
Straight-up / Re: "Great Square" System
June 01, 2013, 09:04:04 PM
Every Game is a complete game - do not use the same Table for different games.

That's as far as I  had to read.

TwoCat

#471
Off-topic / Re: Nice for some eh!
June 01, 2013, 04:27:48 PM
Tornadoes?
#472
Here me now and believe me later:  If you had the results of 500 honest shoes--I don't care where they came from--and you could reverse engineer a system to make all of them win, you would have the "Holy Grail". 

Anyone want to point out how ignorant I am for that statement??

I've played a lot of Back-A-Rat!!  I don't even know how to count the wins for certain.  Something about 7 or 8 or draw another card if the dealer's nose itches....something!.  All I need to see is a P or B.

If you can win on 500 shoes--any 500--then you have the "Holy Grail".

Sam
#473
Chrisbis

You know, the man trusted you and you are giving hints. 

In my humble opinion as one who has been trusted with many systems, you might want to consider just saying, "It works." or "it doesn't work."  Beyond that you are giving hints.

Hope you don't take offense. 

Sam
#474
Dang, Normy...It wasn't THAT much money!!

I can always cancel the credit card.  He offers a thirty-day guarantee.

So-----------two votes against the idea.

Sam
#475
OK, I may just buy it!!

I won't share it if works; I believe in free enterprise.  I would tell if it doesn't or does.

Who votes for TwoCat to spend his hard earned retirement money??

Who?

Who?

(Is there an owl in here?)

TwoCat
#476
Straight-up / Re: Dane's "XOXOX" system.
May 31, 2013, 12:34:32 PM
Dane

I have changed the name to "XOXOX" in all posts. 

Sam
#477
Straight-up / Re: Dane's "X0X0X" system.
May 31, 2013, 12:32:21 PM
Quote from: Dane on May 31, 2013, 08:52:34 AM
So you are not muted now? No hard feelings!
I myself have not called this system  "Tic Tac Toe". It might be silly  and without basis in logic, math or reason, as you claim.
And of course I am glad that you have not lost yet.  I have.  And I NEVER SAY NEVER. Losing might be a matter of TIME. TIME is the key factor. The goddess of Fortune has all the time in the world.
                                                                                Dane
#478
Straight-up / Re: Dane's "XOXOX" system.
May 31, 2013, 03:18:23 AM
Greetings!   ^-^

Today we went to Riverwind Casino and played this silly system again on Roulette Evolution, an RNG with 00--American, you know!

I know this idea has no basis in logic, math or reason but it worked very well for me today.  I turned a $20 into $62.25 betting .25.  I bet one .50 as my wife sat down and I could not let her out bet me.  We hit on the second spin.  We tried again and hit on the third.  She is amazed!

So, try it if you wish; don't if you don't. 

As I said once before, I have never lost a nickel with this system.

TwoCat
#479
And then there's DBLT

Decision before last Tuesday.......

:))
#480
Would you settle for a TwoCat answer?

R...B..."B" is sometimes called "the number that came" or "the spun number".  "R" is the penultimate number or the "DBL"..decision before the last decision.  Depending on what you are looking at, it can be ECs, straight up, dozens, columns or whatever.

If you were betting ECs for DBL, you would bet R. 

TwoCat