Quote from: Pockets on January 26, 2014, 06:02:09 AM
  If you think it's futile, I will leave it here.

Pockets

I do not--in any way, shape or form--think it's futile.

Sam

Thanks, Pockets.  Let me ask you point blank:  Do you have a Consistently Profitable Bet?  One that will make money today, tomorrow and next year?

Not asking you to post it, just if it exists.

Sam

While Stef writes the bot and makes it fly, Nick is the fellow who writes my sheets and sheets for many others.  I have put the man through the wringer and others have, too.

Here's a glass to you, Nick!

Sam

Pockets

Is your method the one where you bet on only one number for 36 spins and then wait for a hit?  I can't find the thread, but I pretty much memorized it.  (Snicker!)  Where is that darn thread?

Anyway, you don't have to prove anything.  No one does.  No one can.  No matter what you do some fellow can always ask, "Yeah?  What about the next million?"  And the bloke is right!

Sam

Love me or hate me but you can not forget me.

Who said that??

Hello

One of the features every bot needs is the ability to import spins from a .txt file and run them.  This allows for thousands of spins to be tested in a short time.  Another feature is an internal RNG like many of Nick's sheets have.

Could graphs be just around the corner?

I would encourage all ExcelBot users to send Stef a little $$$ for his efforts.  I did.

Sam

Aw, geez!!  I got up "upside down guy".  One more thing to worry about....

Thank you, Pockets.

Man, if you get the slightest nod from 6, which you did, you must be onto something. 

I'll give this days of study. 

Sam

Quote from: Pockets on January 17, 2014, 01:14:50 PM
Coming to the final observation. Remember what Bayes says. Do not treat spins as individual outcomes. Combine 3 spins, combine 4 spins and so on and so forth, you get a series. That will give you the ability to use probability theory in a better way. Treat every spin as an individual outcome you will never come out of the game's negative expectation. How do we use it here?

Treat spins in attacks of 36 spins and cycles of wins. What does it mean. Lets consider a scenario where you have your tracked number hitting at 3rd spin, 20th spin, 60th spin, 125th spin, 128th spin. So we attack exactly for 36 spins. Our cycle for tracking ends whenever there is a hit and retracking begins. So here.

1-3 - both attack and 1st cycle ends
4-20 - both attack and 2nd cycle ends
21-56 - attack ends, 3rd cycle ends only at 60th spin
61-96 - attack ends, 4th cycle ends only at 125th spin
126-128 - attack and 5th cycle ends.

Ask if you are not understanding this portion. This is a key. This is what will help us getting through extremes when a number sleeps for long spells for multiple cycles.

I'll ask.  I don't get any of it.

Sam

Not a word on how to program it.  I guess you have to write those .dgt files like for RX.

Xander

You just wrote:  Unfortunately It's all that some gambling authors have to sell because they suck at math.

Let's assume they did not suck at math.  Let's assume they had a PhD in math from, where, Oklahoma University?, would they write a better book on roulette and gambling?

Sam

Normy

I would be especially interested in how hard it is to program.  Is it GUI?  Does a person need your knowledge to program the thing.

Sam

Chris

Please leave the thread open for Pockets to further explain his method.  If you lock it, he might get a burr and delete the whole enchilada.

Sam

Pockets

As you may or may not know, my wife had surgery on her ankle ten days ago and I am a 100% caregiver with limited time.

I really want to examine this when time permits.

Sam

I was wondering why the worm would want to turn.....

Now we know why the chicken crossed the road and why the worm turned.

TwoCat