I have learned several, but the most poignant is this:  What I can do with play money I can't replicate with real money.  Even if it's not my money!!

Sam

Hey, Mr. Ralph!

Are you putting in a win goal or a stop-spin number?  Or are you just quitting when you're ahead?

Must try this as soon as the wife will let me use her computer.  (7)

Sam

Just to let you know, we're watching your progress!

Thanks!!

Sam

Bally

Is this the same screen shot Vic posted?  This is the first screen shot I can actually see.  I see one inch of the top of his!

Sam

Hi Lady

Well, it depends on whether or not you're playing RNG or real wheel; on-line or at a real casino.  You must get your bets down!  The number you leave out seems to always win.  With RNG you have plenty of time.  At Dublin you have plenty of time when the table is busy.  Then everyone leaves and the play speeds up.

Playing multiple methods is good if you 1.) Can get the bets down and, 2.) have the bankroll for each method, and 3) Can keep it all straight in your mind.  I like to play a method a while and let it rest while I play something else.  There is no logic to it, but it seems if you play a method too long, it always fails.  When you first try it, it wins!  So I let it simmer a few days and it's "new" again.

Here in Oklahoma we have an Indian casino called Riverwind.  It is 00 RNG by Roulette Revolution.  It seats six players and is fair.  You have around 30 seconds between spins so you always know when the wheel will spin.  There I do play two methods at once.  If no one asks me when the 00 last hit, I can keep up with the bookwork and do pretty well.

Glad to see you posting.  I'm sure you're aware that women see things much differently than men do, so your point of view is most welcome!

I will keep my filthy, Redneck language to a minimum!

TwoCatSam

Two wheels are side by side.

Joe plays twelve units the first dozen.

Bill plays a unit on each number in the first dozen.

#10 comes on one wheel and #5 on the other.  Who wins more?

Thanks, Bally.

Sam

You are right, Superman, about your last statements.  We all look for  hiding behind a tree.

But let's flip the pancake over.  I kinda trust your posts.  If you posted that you developed a system and played it for 100,000 spins and it showed great promise and then you went to real money and never once got above the even-water mark--well, I'd believe you.  These other fellows are just as trustworthy.  Frankly, I don't know what to believe!

You win.  Ophis wins.  Ralph wins way too much.  Sometimes I even win!

What I saw was this:  I played Turner's "Touching Numbers" system flat betting with pennies.  I then went to a mild progression with pennies.  All was well.  Then I went to dimes and never got another winner--period!  I changed the SHA to 60 and set the drop-down number-changer several times.  No win. 

Sure "seems" like the system tanked at the most opportune time for BV!!

Thanks for your answer.

Sam

Bally

"The  ( ) contain the furthest back dozen and/or column."

There is always a furthest back dozen and column, but many times you only list one.  Why?

20 2B (3C) S
22 2A (3C) S
26 3B (C) O<-------------In this case, is not the 1 the furthest back?

Sam

Bally

Once when I worked on washing machines a lady told me the "factory serviceman" told her he could not fix her machine properly unless she signed up to buy soap from them.  I thought that was totally a lie!

One the other side of town, a second lady told me the same story. 

When I hear the exact same story from two people who don't even know each other, I begin to believe it.

Maybe I'm just looking for the Boogey Man this morning!!      On Christmas at that!!

Sam

Bally

I hope this fits on your thread.

I know precious little about this SHA thing that Bet Voyager claims proves their numbers are random.  Could anyone explain it?  How do we know, like I know I have two hands, that this thing is totally up front?  Can it be manipulated?

The reason I ask this is I know a man who developed a system with BVNZ and won steadily for over two thousand bets placed.  Not spins, but bets placed.  He was up 2,000 units and went to real money.  His system tanked immediately.

Another fellow programmed a bot and went some 100,000 spins or more and won a large sum.  He then went to real money and the thing tanked. 

Something I've noticed from my own play is the first session I win.  After that, all downhill.  Over and over and over again.

Now, all this could just be random doing her thing.

Or is it?

Sam

Thank you for posting this.  I feel this is to discourage robots.

Merry Christmas, Lady K!

I wish you would post more!

TwoCat

Stef

I have no other problems and I can view all of the shots on rouletteforum.cc

Sam

On the "other" forum, ego will prove/disprove the thing with his eight-sided dice.

As I read this a thought comes to mind:  Luck can hold math at bay--for a while.

Sam

I'm wondering if there is any connection between the two problems I'm having.