Today we have had a large downtime, it surprised me as the hosters didn't have any scheduled downtime. Seems to be related to taking up too much ram. Our server clogged. It happens, we're back online.

We'll stick to this plan up to the 1st as it's already paid; hopefully by that time we get to have some paying members again via The Tool.

Chances are we'll move away from US hosting anyway.

Regardless on how competitive price-to-resource allocation is within the US, there are some other things to consider recently. i.e.  laws are getting way too invasive.

(CISPA anyone? --Let's say I'm not particularly fond of US' policies at this particular time.)

There are better alternatives in Europe. Pricier but freer. We'll likely move before our billing period ends. Likely to a provider in Sweden or the Netherlands.

Regards and feel free to enjoy the forum as usual.

Walter, I appreciate your concern. I'm not interested in 'taking the money and flee' if that's what you hint. I'm aiming at using proceedings to fund other projects and give back.


I know this might "bomb", but I also know it can help many. I'm all-in to help. The Tool is important since it is a cornerstone to assist... us. From hosting to sponsoring software to the creation of programming languages to empower people, including a bet-oriented one.


I'm most definitely giving it a go I'll advice everyone to start playing with minimal units so failure doesn't mean much. No huge budget-wrecking scenarios to them. On the other hand, those who gain success can compound the unit to increase their earnings and benefit their lives and families. It is worth.


Many thanks again for your caring words.


Vic

   Thank you very much!

Quote from: Bayes on April 11, 2013, 09:25:51 PM
Isn't that basically what your "Tool" and Gizmo's "gizmo" is all about?

Indeed. Automating the process is all it is about. (and becoming more efficient at processing of course).

A human is limited as to the amount of real-time processing "power" he can exercise in between spins. An AI agent is only limited by the amount of resources allocated to it.

A human might for instance calculate a set of 4, 5 wheel-based triggers, maybe more (I doubt realistically someone could go beyond calculating double-digit triggers right, spin after spin after spin; the more demanding the more "ground" the brain becomes to perform over spins)... an AI agent on the other hand can be aware of hundreds or thousands of triggers and make calculations (i.e. SD and others). It does make a difference in spotting where the current opportunities lie. Assuming you grant there is a timeline which can be attributed to the random stream and accept the triggers/selections have cycles of activity and inactivity, for which the bettor's work is identifying the profitable phases as accurate as possibly and "piggybacking" on them while they last. The more triggers/selections processed, the more possibilities. A human can only see (process) a small "chunk" of the actual possibilities developing at all times on the many triggers. An AI agent can see more and hence has more to grab from (and jump to) due to the many timelines derived from the triggers being tracked.

Quote from: Bayes on April 11, 2013, 09:25:51 PM
IMO any method can be implemented on a computer, no matter how complex. Even intuition can be coded as long as you can express how you come to your decisions even somewhat fuzzily.

Spot-on dear friend.

I guess in the end, all that matters is whether AI is able to deliver a better hit rate than random.

Doesn't it?

"In artificial intelligence, an expert system is a computer system that emulates the decision-making ability of a human expert."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expert_system

This is an interesting line of topic to discuss around in our bet-oriented place.

...What are your personal opinions on the topic? Where do you stand on it? Do you believe we can delegate "thinking" to a computer to make it at levels which are more accurate than our own human one?

Feel free to express! Whether you are pro or against AI 

Esoito said:

AI is "the study and design of intelligent agents, where an intelligent agent is a system that perceives its environment and takes actions that maximize its chances of success."  [Wikipedia]

I've often wondered why AI isn't more prominent in betting software.

Is it because there are few AI coders with the necessary skills?

Or the concept is basically flawed is some way when applied to betting?

Or few have really sat down to seriously consider its potential?

Or...?

I believe this is an accompanying topic:

Bet, Trigger, System, Strategy, Meta-strategy

It's insanity:

Coming To Plates In Europe: Patented Vegetables, Produced By Conventional Breeding

Quote
If anything the casinos were doing was technically illegal, there's a good chance they could get the law changed so that it would soon become legal.

Priceless!

Thanks for bringing-in the article.

Let's wish him a prompt recovery

Hopefully he'll be back in good shape soon. We need to award him some time for recovery. It could have been worse. Let's thank he's recovering.

Quote from: Gizmotron on April 09, 2013, 07:32:18 AM
...as beautiful as Milla Jovovich...

DISCLAIMER

The ads you see as a guest in the forum are part of a prior agreement pertaining to the forum.

They are strictly delivered by 3rd-party off-site placement. As they are remotely inserted, we do not have any control as to the content of the ad inventory from our side. We do not explicitly endorse or provide support for the product(s) featured by them on its current or updated form.

You should use the contacts at http://www.genuinewinner.com/contact.html in order to address anything regarding to the contents of the advertisements. We disclaim any involvement with the products featured by the ads; our commitment is no other than for the purpose of placement for keeping our end of the agreement to operate.

If you do not want to view the ads, you can just register and visit as a logged-in user:

http://betselection.cc/register/

Thank you very much for your understanding.

Posted on behalf of the BetSelection.cc Staff

Hopefully as "drama" is gone, we can continue to see the very helpful side of Kimo showing again

I only need confirmation from Kimo to restore the messages back for the thread to continue; I most certainly hope it's not killed before it starts to get juicy!! We all want to see this GPM Philosophy for Beginners discussion flourish

Quote from: Albalaha on April 07, 2013, 10:55:14 AM
Victor may ask Ophis for trial of bot and can check whether what was claimed, was true or not.

I suggest Bayes get a trial of the bot