OK, I can make it a module for BetSoftware, as we are re-launching it.

We need to set one more thing:

1) Do you want to clear all losses on three consecutive strikes, i.e. LLLLLLLLLwww (parlay)

OR

2) Non-consecutive wins, such as: LLwLLLLLwLLw (cancellation of losses in parts)

Jule, welcome to the forum.

Do you want a dynamic progression calculator for 3 wins in a row? A cancellation?

(Please bear in mind 12 numbers pay 2 to 1)

Regards.

Happy Birthday to our community

Getting things done @ BetSoftware.cc

Well, in my personal case, it has been a journey from "numerical advantage" systems to one (1) number.

You just can't refine your bet selection further. (What's left? Zero numbers? ) This is the ultimate bet selection coverage for me.

I like the fact you have 35 times as room for your current picked method's timeline to match that of the game and still come out ahead.

An "L" is 36 misses while a "W" is any hit during this time-frame. It gives you a chance to ponder if what you're picking is right and change course dynamically without a huge dent to your bank.

You can't lose more than one unit per pick. You reduce human error to a minimum (if you prefer to bet manually). It's a set amount of units placed in only one spot.

Yes, you may need to be patient as the games can stretch when a single cycle can last up to 37 spins, but that's what bots are for.

All in all, I believe this is one way to play calmly, compound, and in general -with the right selection- it may be better than the "martingale on red" or other similar methods, especially for newcomers. This is my personal opinion, based on the fact betting only one number per spin teaches patience, discipline and can finally take the incessant feeling of desperately "*having* to hit the next spin to feel a winner", away from the psyche.

These days, if you ask me to play a massive bankroll with a negative progression versus a single number for real money, I'll take one number + compounding the unit.

Hey! People can grow and refine over time
Vic

BetSelection.cc opened on Oct 16 2012... Our community is about to turn 4 years old!! 

[attachimg=1]

As a birthday gift we all can give, let's keep discussion focused on gambling topics, for making BetSelection.cc a true betting-discussion space.

On my side, as the admin, I'm setting time apart to complete some software projects; namely relaunching BetSoftware 2.0 -including first Baccarat modules-, as well as launching a 1-number Roulette Betting Tool to sponsor us sustainably over time.

> We are certainly here to stay.

...May we always be on the productive side with you accompanying us for the long run

---

Hey! What do you want for us in our 4th year, for the 2016-2017 period? 

Thanks for your thought-provoking input guys, this type of discussion is quite enjoyable (at least to me ).

I really like the fact we can learn from each other simply by interacting, while also enriching other fellows' knowledge as we do so.

Quote from: Albalaha on October 09, 2016, 05:20:27 AM[...]Unless one has patience to keep playing thousands of spins to conclude a game, it is not recommended.

With the way I'm playing one number right now, I'd be the happiest man if my game wouldn't conclude in thousands of spins.

I've learned the hard way you must not try to recover with negative progressions, not even soft ones.

Right now I apply a money management akin to the 75% MM posted at:

http://betselection.cc/money-management-103/75-money-management/

[attachimg=1]

It is actually 80/10/10 now and I’m happy happy, joy joy with the results.

The attack bank is 36 units per cycle.

No stop win.

Once a cycle is lost, it isn’t “chased” at all.

This fallen cycle bankroll should be absorbed by new “cushion” minimal-unit banks arising naturally, especially by means of a good "compound walk”. Never rising the unit from the lifetime bank.

---

You know? I’m actually surprised there isn’t more discussion about compounding the base unit, reserve bankrolls and -in general- discussion about Inter-session money management.

A Full-Stack MM handling reserve banks, exact amount of $$$ to take on success and what to do in between sessions is quite important if you ask me.

Gambling Philosophy section, so... here's one for those inclined to bet on the lesser side: what are the reasons for considering one number selection as the ultimate bet selection according to you?

One can only wonder if they are the exact opposite on why a maximum-coverage with a 35-number bet sucks.

There are some concepts for backing this up, including attaining the maximum volatility, for getting ahead the most within the short-term of a session.

What are your thoughts about one-number selections?

Let's talk about this very interesting 1 

Thanks Nathan,

-7.69% for the player... What can we say about it?

(other than people still play the lottery )}

---

Hey! Lay your bets: How long until 0000? 

Thank you

Thank you Bally!

You rock

Quote from: Mr J on July 30, 2016, 10:26:06 PMare the pockets HOT or the numbers??

If you're targetting the physical wheel / device, I'd say it's the pockets

(nice to see you back)

Hello, we're taking a bit because we're going to devote BetSoftware to the public domain.

Still haven't decided on the new name, chances are it is pdBets. I'm officially desisting from trying to make money from the gambling community straight and I'm leaning towards sponsoring ourselves with selling to public domain software "power users" + selling cheap computer hardware.

Both www.PublicDomain.tech and www.CheapComputers.site are registered already.

In the mean time, I'm freelancing locally to sustain myself (every little bit counts right now). Actually, I'm getting more time for coding at home working on my own instead of going every day to the office, so I'm happy in this regard

Creating software for the public domain makes me happy too. Building the web engine of our dreams makes my day every time.

The long term plan is to give copies to everyone for free, then sell extra services to the eventual power users who get hooked to our software. We may end-up being the "upstream source" for those who create derivates, as well as getting other benefits. Besides the betting scene, there is a wide range of under-served niches/communities to which we can tap into. A bit here, a bit there... the public domain site can "pinch" enough for me to sustain my family nicely.

It isn't a particularly hard goal. It's just a single family hence even with moderate internet success we're satisfied

We're going to release the first public betas for July either here or at the new public domain site (likely here) to kick-start the movement.

Cheers!

Thanks for the kind words Justin.

We're about to launch version 2.0.0.1 as an early alpha release with public download links.

Please stay tuned

Hello AK, let's focus on testing BetSoftware 2.0

We're about to launch version 2.0.0.1 as an early alpha release to start getting feedback.

The Excel one gets ported in the first modules.

We can continue at: http://betselection.cc/betsoftware-free/

Cheers!

CHART #1:
- 3 units on dozens 2 and 3.
- 1 unit on squares 2/6 and 7/11.
Uncovered: 0, 1, 4, 9, 12.

[attachimg=1]

CHART #2:
- 3 units on dozens 2 and 3.
- 1 unit on squares 1/5 and 8/12.
Uncovered: 0, 3, 6, 7, 10.

[attachimg=2]

CHART #3:
- 3 units on dozens 1 and 3.
- 1 unit on squares 14/18 and 19/23.
Uncovered: 0, 13, 16, 21, 24.

[attachimg=3]

CHART #4:
- 3 units on dozen 1 and 3.
- 1 unit on squares 13/17 and 20/24.
Uncovered: 0, 15, 18, 19, 22.

[attachimg=4]

CHART #5:
- 3 units on dozens 1and 2.
- 1 unit on squares 26/30 and 31/35.
Uncovered: 0, 25, 28, 33, 36.

[attachimg=5]

CHART #6:
- 3 units on dozens 1and 2.
- 1 unit on squares 25/29 and 32/36.
Uncovered: 0, 27, 30, 31, 34.

[attachimg=6]

Column 2 is covered at all times by these bets:
[attachimg=7]