Hi guys, this small section is here for testing a focused format for BetSelection.cc

With the arrival of BetForum.cc in 2016, there is an opportunity to copy all the non-system topics over there in order to have the regular gambling discussion at the BetForum while hosting a very focused method study place in here  .

The dynamics for the focused method study space being:

• One (1) section per method.
• One (1) sticky thread explaining the method's procedure.
• The rest of threads in the section being test results, talks about implementations in software and system-focused topics.

Each system variation having its own separate dedicated section with its own method procedure sticky thread + tests / implementations / focused topics.

...What begins as a humble test in this section may become our forum's dynamics once BetForum.cc is out 

Street-wheel bet selection.

Procedure:

Bet the street forming two unique super zones of 3.

Remarks:

They must be unique or you risk merely betting super zone 4.

Example:

Given the following formation:

[attachimg=1]

Your target bet is street #7:

[attachimg=2]

Because it forms super zone 3 with streets 25-34-07,

[attachimg=3]

As well as a zone of 3 with streets 04-07-10:

[attachimg=4]

Bet Selection: a way to choose betting locations (in any form or shape). A bet selection is a flat bet.

Money Management: is any progressive scheme, defined as not being flat betting. Both positive (up as you win) as well as negative (up as you lose).

System/Method: Is a combination of Bet Selection and Money Management with a win goal, as well as a stop-loss per session.

Strategy: Is a broader concept which implicates elements such as using systems, inter-session money management, recovery modes, unit value modification, lifetime bankroll management and in general a plan for using systems, bet selection and money management schemes as a whole intended to having a shot at winning.

Hello, I provided a point of view at this thread:

http://betsoftware.cc/general-discussion/i-want-to-buy-roulettecheckmate-software-need-advise/

TL;DR: Like Esoito would say: Caveat emptor. Be wary of anyone peddling X or Y amount of profit per hour in a game of chance.

..."every player must develop his/her own winning way" (there are no shortcuts if you ask me).

---

Hope you find success in your endeavor.

Ivica Boban a.k.a F_LAT_INO passed away three months ago.

GLC's account: http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15176

Many of us can attest he was a great fellow indeed. A loss for our community.

---

Since you must remember the good times. A thread of Ivica's joyful sharing of pictures and experiences:

http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=3377.15

[attachimg=1]

...May the heavenly ivory ball always rest in your winning number for all the eternity dear Ivica [smiley]msn/red_rose.png[/smiley]

Thanks for sharing with us dear Ronjo.

It's very nice to see you around, strong as ever 

This is the upgrade to the 50% MM, the 75% MM version:

[attachimg=1]

It can prove itself useful when dealing with "streaky" methods.

The gist of this upgrade keeps on being maximizing unit size when on a positive tram of winning sessions, and minimizing the losses when things aren't going your way.

You may want to check the 50% MM thread for the original discussion:

http://betselection.cc/money-management-103/50-money-management/

Cheers!
Vic

Hello dear Minibac, direct PM inbox link is:

http://betselection.cc/pm/

(We are way overdue on our forum re-install to clean all bugs, mostly because of the base install erm... sucks! I know it'll be done "this year" when we also reboot BetForum, when exactly? There are so many variables involved it's a mystery even to me).

Cheers & many thanks for being here

Quote from: tdx on May 23, 2015, 01:29:52 AMCab you give an example with a few numbers ?

My pĺeasure tdx,

Assuming these two wheels:

http://betselection.cc/actualshands/4000-db-table-1-spins/

34
8
33
16
0

http://betselection.cc/actualshands/5300-db-table-1-spins/

23
20
2
5
26

You get one from each wheel, interspersed:


34
23
8
20
33
2
16
5
0
26

---

This is quite ideal for generating more sets for testing out of past files.

On the other hand, live gaming requires your presence betting both streams with your system as if you were betting one wheel, so it's better for RNG casinos (i.e. where the player bets at his/her own pace).

(Of course, if doing it with more wheels, then you must be there to bet every one of them as per your chosen wheel sequence)

---

...Just another technique for the arsenal...

Cheers!

There's something about the PDF that isn't letting it pass automatically.

Please send it via email ( betselection﹫gmail.com ) and I'll upload and post it on your behalf manually. We do care

Thanks a bunch for sharing.

Hello and welcome to the forum MB,

Our anti-spam measures try to stop forum spammers from the beginning, seems your post didn't pass-through because it was a first post with addition/attachment (which is caught by the filter). Now you're clear to post it again. Should pass without a problem this time.

Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. (We're a spam-free forum thanks to our measures, but they can get us a false-positive from time to time).

If you want to be certain, please send your pdf file to:  betselection﹫gmail.com

Cheers!
Vic

We all know the timeline concept: you place numbers/results as they are spun, one after the other, then create a "line" representing sequential results in a moment in time.

You can generate timelines simply by annotating numbers as they show up, or you can "transform" them into R/B, E/O, L/W or any other notation. The sequential results any the format you choose is your generated timeline.

A curious effect from roulette being an independent-trials game is you can mix different streams of results and you are expected to end-up with the same rough totals. This means you can mix the results from two roulette wheels, one after the other, and you'll end up generating a new timeline comprised by results from both numerical streams, as valid as any of the original two. Should you measure a "tram" of this new timeline you're expected to get (roughly) the same results as you'd get from the same amount of spins using any single roulette.

Select random trams of 37 spins from this newly-formed timeline and you'll notice roughly the same  patterns forming, the same "law of the third", the same amount of repeats as usual.

In here lies a way to make your own betting method a "moving target": by mixing several timelines in real-time, you can pick the one where you see the most favorable conditions.

Expand the concept to three roulette wheels: A, B, C. You will create three timelines: AB, BC, AC.

If you're betting repeats and notice one new timeline sucks and another one rocks, you'll stick to the one rocking. The law of small numbers may give you a chance (remember you can't compete against the law of large numbers, but according to the small numbers one, you have a chance that variance could go your way).

You're entering in a biased tram, generated by yourself but as valid any other bona-fide set of numbers.

---

The condition of course being you don't cherry-pick the results before-hand and aren't mixing them on purpose, but rather allow them to "happen".

You can create as many "timelines" as you wish by using bona-fide numbers (even RNG) mixed with those happening in your own game to choose the one that favors your current method the most.

---

The corollary: numbers don't matter, only events within a set/tram of a certain size do.

Thanks for sharing your ways with us dear friend.

Kudos to you for sticking to the creative side

Keep 'em coming! Gladly, we can track basically everything these days thanks to computers 

Hello guys,

As you know our forum hosts people from all corners of the world. There are actually some fellows who understand/read the posts thanks to English-based translation sites yet can't produce a reply by themselves.

What do you think about opening a section to help non-English-speaking fellows to communicate in good English?

Of course we don't want to publish "Robotic /Tarzan posts" coming from machine translators directly; this may be a viable workaround for bringing posts from non-native English speakers to the fore.

Thanks for sharing Ignatus; you're one creative fellow [smiley]cxp/glasses.gif[/smiley]