Striking
Okay, I have stopped the thoughts about planning when the time might come, or how to figure out when it is going to appear, etc. That is usually the downfall or the path to losing more than you can win, or sets the player onto the path to recoup, instead of smacking the casino a bit.
I call it striking, not so much riding the bias or taking advantage. Plain and simple, striking.
What serves me well and avoids me from the, 'I was an unintelligent and simply did not wager' punishment!
Bias, to me is seeing it as it is happening, not wagering for it. As it happens, just say I was flat betting a few hands. It started. I won 3 hands straight and I now see the bias, whatever it might be. The correction, the abnormality, the curve, the rarity, whatever it is--does not matter one bit. (That is where so many, most all, players go wrong. They are trying to define and figure it out.)
So I won the 3 hands flat betting. Say I was at $150.00 a hand as an example. I am up $450.00 for that section. I will take the $450.00 and split it into 4 units of $110.00 each and use those 4 wagers of $110.00 for my (1 + 4 Side Parlay) wagering for the striking attempts. One successful (1 + 4 Side Parlay) will get me $3,520.00 if I am not mistaking. Yes, some of the wagers will have to be sacrificed, some flat bets and possibly one or more of the (1 + 4 Side Parlay) attempts. Progression and a continuance (1 + 4 Side Parlay) is a lot to ask to come out of. But when something is hitting, don't be scared, scared to win-scared to wager, IMO is the worst thing a player can subscribe to.
But as far as a striking, that is something along the lines as to what I would do. Rather than a planned attack. Planned attacks to me are extremely difficult and usually do not work out.
Okay, I have stopped the thoughts about planning when the time might come, or how to figure out when it is going to appear, etc. That is usually the downfall or the path to losing more than you can win, or sets the player onto the path to recoup, instead of smacking the casino a bit.
I call it striking, not so much riding the bias or taking advantage. Plain and simple, striking.
What serves me well and avoids me from the, 'I was an unintelligent and simply did not wager' punishment!
Bias, to me is seeing it as it is happening, not wagering for it. As it happens, just say I was flat betting a few hands. It started. I won 3 hands straight and I now see the bias, whatever it might be. The correction, the abnormality, the curve, the rarity, whatever it is--does not matter one bit. (That is where so many, most all, players go wrong. They are trying to define and figure it out.)
So I won the 3 hands flat betting. Say I was at $150.00 a hand as an example. I am up $450.00 for that section. I will take the $450.00 and split it into 4 units of $110.00 each and use those 4 wagers of $110.00 for my (1 + 4 Side Parlay) wagering for the striking attempts. One successful (1 + 4 Side Parlay) will get me $3,520.00 if I am not mistaking. Yes, some of the wagers will have to be sacrificed, some flat bets and possibly one or more of the (1 + 4 Side Parlay) attempts. Progression and a continuance (1 + 4 Side Parlay) is a lot to ask to come out of. But when something is hitting, don't be scared, scared to win-scared to wager, IMO is the worst thing a player can subscribe to.
But as far as a striking, that is something along the lines as to what I would do. Rather than a planned attack. Planned attacks to me are extremely difficult and usually do not work out.