Quote from: ADulay on May 02, 2017, 05:59:12 PM
And if they're rigging the shoe so that the wagers on the most money are losing, I'd really like to know that one.
AD
Yes! And at times it does seem that way and yet--at others (an equal amount or more??) that big money wins. IMO--it seems we all dwell on and remember quite vividly those times when say some goes table max and every one is table min or close to it and the guy wagering the $10 or $25 wins.
But, I have been at winning tables when the dealer had to pay in larger demonization chips and take back (say there was 4,900.00 out there in green and black) and the dealer would pay in purple and chocolate and take all the green and black, etc., until she got a fill that was being rushed. Just most of the time the players give it back and don't take all the dealers bank in a short period of time, but it does happen.
But, seriously in all reality there is nothing the shoe can produce that would guarantee the players lose, no matter how much they wager. Since there is no optional draws or player/dealer generated optional anything--and since the player can wager on either side, there is no way a shoe can be set up to 'cheat' a player, maybe some far fetched theory about a continuous shuffled shoe with the card reader and motherboard fallacy within the shufflers, etc., however it is not a continuous shuffled shoe.
I have sat down countless times and after numerous losing hands, I see someone winning. I go with them and they lose. I wait out and they win the next 4 hands, I go with them and they lose. I wait out and they win once again. I mean every single time I go with them-they lose. And this is for a period of 10-15 times, not once or twice or three or even four times. It happens. And when I was wagering I might be $100 on my thinking and they are opposite me with $500 or $1,000 or more.
I don't know about you, but I definitely remember my losses and those times when I won really good and then gave it all back rather than the times I win and it is not record setting, etc.