When do we get the EDIT feature back, because without it is a royal pain the rear!!!!! BIG TIME!!! Vic?

Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: wannawin on March 07, 2017, 06:24:09 PM
I have been reading the madness topic and it shows that it is cut and lacks the initial information. I found an original version in rouletteforum.cc published on the EC Method thread. The truth is that I am curious now to see how many spins it holds although we know that EC methods are doomed to fail.
I do not understand why delete the original posts. In my logic a system is published because the author wants others to evaluate it or else to protect a system it should never be published anywhere . The safest place to protect a method is in the author's head.
Quote from: Gizmotron on March 07, 2017, 11:10:21 AM
Anyway, the author says that patterns are predictable in the section title. He goes on to say there is no predictability based on probability, "Consequently each number has the same chance of selection in the next game..."
Probability will not tell you when a coincidence will occur and how long it will last. Therefore probability has nothing to do with prediction. Nobody can tell you how long a coincidence will last after it has begun.
ref; Mason Malmuth; "Gambling Theory and Other Topics" ; 2004
That is basically correct. And it holds true for short term as I tried in other posts to define as 'Sections' with 'Turning Points', they almost never last half shoes or whole shoes, almost never, extremely rare as I also wrote about. But once again, events, not numbers. Numbers repeating themselves is also rare or we can also say--much rarer than events. Events are clearly defined repetitively. Numbers repeating themselves or causing events or subjective to a much rarer, series that is extremely hard to follow or predict as you say.
Let me make it perfectly clear. Coincidences exist and they can be exploited as if they were predictable, even though they are never predictable.