Quote from: Albalaha on January 19, 2020, 07:53:46 AM
That is what I want to know from the admin. How this shoe generated 10x to 30x of bankroll. What was an average person's bankroll etc? Interesting to read.
There were over 10 people playing. At least 8 of the people did extremely well and yes, between 10 to 30 times their buy-ins. $1,000.00 to $2,000.00 most. A few at $500.00 to $800.00 or so. A couple at the $2,500.00 to $3,000.00 buy-in range. Like I said, at least one got wiped out and another possibly was even, got frustrated and walked, no better than even.
We all followed the player side heavy in the beginning. Once again, I have written about just that and posted numerous pictures of B&M boards showing just that, especially in the beginning. As well the 0-1-2-3 LOW TIES which usually reflects the shoe presentments holding steady, no matter what the shoe was producing. And it did to a 'T' with that shoe as well.
Most of these people were at $200.00 to $1,000.00 a hand. Up to Section B, where the 2nd small streak of Players that ended with a Tie, most of us realized right at 12 winning wagers, with a few losses. I would say, almost all of us were at, as an example, $400.00 and win, next wager would be $800 with the full parlay and win, then put the $400.00 back in the buy-in stack and wager one more time $800.00 to $1,000.00 and win and then back down to whatever each one's level was.
Another great shot with winning in this shoe was in Section C, we all went for the twos as well. We got every one of them and when it fell off on the 7th one, we stopped with the twos.
Most of us hit the F-7 with at least a quarter out there on the 10th and 11th hands, I have cited and written about F-7s and what I see as their predominant presentments in relation to appearing in certain numbers and because of a heavy or dominant section or streak of Players winning, etc.
F-7 came again mid-way. I have said so many times reference the F-7 if it is early enough and low ties and Player heavy, etc., 1 or 2 will almost always produce a 3rd. Likewise, a 3rd with the same situations presenting themselves and turning Banker heavy or equaling out anyways, with generally produce a 4th and 5th. And we all went heavy on F-7s, right at the end of Section C where the chop started for the 3 times, especially when it went 4 with that first Player presentment that turned into a double Player where that line is in the start of Section D.
Player side had a much larger amount of natural presentments early on and as well, almost every hand that was not a natural for the Player, their 3rd card either brought the Player side up to an 8 or a 9 and if that did not happen and say the Player had a 6, the Banker's 3rd card almost reduced them every single time. It was not a time or two, it was repetitive, we saw it and followed it. It continued so we followed, huge difference in not predicting, etc., etc.
We also hit those 2nd line Players heavy and stopped because we saw every single Player natural win would cut to the Bankers side after that second streak of Players that cut with that 2nd tie, some went heavy for just that reason and some wagered Banker with a smaller amount. Either way, we continued the win.