QuoteBut I will tell you my worst shoes, where as I lost by the end of the shoe I would average, that I wagered around 25 times.
The shoes that I won, I would average, that I wagered around 40 times.
Definitely this is an interesting thing to think about.
Obviously you should compare how many units you've lost at those 25 hands bet shoes and how many units you have won by wagering 40 times.
In some way we could reduce the 25 and 40 hands by, say a 5 factor, thus getting us 5 bet hands at losing shoes and 8 bet hands at winning ones.
as.
Asym, I will wager a greater amount of hands when I am winning, some are pos progression wagers and others might be just the win money at risk once again. But I almost never do what so many claim, the 1-2 or 3 and stop win for a shoe.
When I am losing, I am looking for the recouping trend and a winning recovery possibility. If you do not play, you cannot win. No matter what the visual/stay out until you see virtual wins, etc., if you don't have money up on the table in play, you cannot win. True you cannot lose also, but your loss will not be recovered either. A wicked catch-22.
And I do have absolutely great, large wins after a period of losses in a shoe. Let's just say at times, it was a 'warm up' period before the end of the 3rd quarter.