Quote from: alrelax on December 04, 2014, 02:46:22 PM
... My experience dictates $500.00 or $1,000.00 and higher on the first wager.  A whole different perspective now.

You're like mrJ on steroids!  A whole different perspective now.

Quote from: alrelax on November 24, 2014, 07:55:49 AM
What happened to all the 'Systems' that will allow one to win repeatedly and over the long run?  I am confused!

I thought you weren't going to post anymore and said your goodbyes? I am confused! [smiley]msn/hot.png[/smiley]

Games of chance are traps to catch schoolboy novices and gaping country squires, who begin with a guinea and end with a mortgage.

– Cumberland.

If anticipating when the new forum will open, I'll leave you with one thought to consider..


Past behaviour is a very good indicator of future behaviour.

Hi RoulettePlayer,

You do realize that if playing this system for as little as $1.00 stakes, your final bet is $14,400 with 3 numbers uncovered... 

Nice to see we have a "mutual regard" for the great racehorse, Vo Rogue.[smiley]aes/lol.png[/smiley]

Quote from: XXVV on November 03, 2014, 07:00:59 AM
Here is my box 10 :

1.3.4.5.11.12.13.21.22.24

Nice group but I think you're throwing some good money away on a few of them.

24 is all the rage at the moment, and rightly so. 11 is a real threat proven at the class & distance. It is also my opinion that you have left out one very good chance.  [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]


Good luck everyone and have a great cup day!

vo rogue!

Now there's a blast from the past. What a great horse he was.

Not as good as lohnro, but pretty good!


A 44% strike rate is a luxury not afforded many punters, though you could still be on the receiving end of long losing streaks of 10 or more, so if using a progression careful steps are still very important.


I would suggest a few things.

Being privy to a solid strike rate like 44% would justify making the effort to learn how to frame your own market, or at least set your own price for each selected horse. Then in time introduce an up as you lose progression calculated around your own market/price assessment. The fine tuning of such a progression would evolve itself, but as an example, you would bet a default stake (like flat betting) on each selection, but when any selection is showing a return of around 30% above your estimated price then you calculate (at your price) the amount needed to recover any outstanding losses and bet that amount on top of the default amount. This ensures any overpriced winner will recover your losses and give you around 30% profit for the sequence.

Hi Ronjo,
Nice to see you here.

Quote from: ADulay on November 01, 2014, 11:50:32 PM
Welcome aboard!

I remember the name from the "old days".

AD

I remember leaving ronjo in my wake in an old roulette challenge!

Quote from: esoito on October 28, 2014, 07:33:54 AM
I won't say who it was.

But I will firmly state it was NOT Victor.

So no more impugning the man, thank you very much.

I know you're not talking about Victor, I was simply stating Victor is also slow at "getting the finished product out".

Perhaps I should have said, "sounds like Victor, also".

Sheesh!

Quote from: esoito on October 27, 2014, 11:00:03 PM

I've had experience in the past where the bot-coder kept dragging his feet. Getting the finished product out of him was like pulling teeth!  Never again.... <grrr>

...sounds like Victor.

Quote from: Rinzler on October 24, 2014, 11:17:42 PM
This is like saying that people caused global warming.  People are a part of nature, so nature did it.

To a certain degree that IS actually true.

Quote from: Bayes on October 19, 2014, 07:40:37 AM
...I decided to cut short the probability/stats tutorial because I'm working on my own blog/web site which will have the same info....

I predicted that. 

Quote from: Dr. Mabuse on October 13, 2014, 12:34:03 PM
A different attitude is  prevailing  in towns with  a cluster of casinos  in contrast   to towns where  one casino is monopolizing the local area.  .

.

Nice to see one of these "NEW members" posting on this thread, but I'd like to hear what NathanDetroit thinks?


I'd also like to hear what Sputnik thinks about Wheelwatcher having his own section?


And how does Slacker feel about Bayes posting all that maths stuff?

[smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]

If it's income Victor needs, then why all the pretentious requests for donations for site costs?

Why not come right out and say, I am running this roulette forum and accessory coding ambitions in order to generate some income to help my family survive in a harsh economic environment. Any monetary assistance for my hard work and efforts would be greatly appreciated.

I'd be more inclined to chuck in a few bucks for that (and I have before) than this, please donate so they don't close us down, petition.