I'd like to know why XXVV places so much importance to and reacts so strongly when his nickname's reputation is challenged?

It's not like his career life and private business dealings are affected in any possible way, it's just his silly nickname within an obscure and anonymous forum that is ever questioned.

I've actually given this some thought and no matter how I evaluate it, I believe the final answer is an over-inflated sense of self, known as Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Historically, there are a lot traits to support this diagnosis within the writings and behaviour of XXVV.


It's either that, or it's to vigorously defend and protect an investment of some sort within the forum.

Both?...who knows.

Actually, these are rhetorical questions... I'm just putting it out there.

I shouldn't need to, but given my diagnosis I will add a disclaimer.

Disclaimer:
We all have silly nicknames.

Ha!

Good luck with that then.

Hello helena,

Thanks for voicing your opinion.

I see you are still hopeful to discover the CEH bet. I guess you must have missed the part where he ripped everybody off all their money then skipped town...


[smiley]cactus/c000.gif[/smiley]

Quote from: DennisBelle on May 24, 2015, 10:47:24 PM
ND,
  Would that make any difference in the win/loss ratio and if so, why?
Dennis

It would make no difference at all. It would only make things more complicated for you to actually play.

If you want to further research this idea I would advise you ignore ND's suggestion.

Not sure if this is the type of answer you were looking for, but I think there is merit in progressing in closed cycle blocks.

The blocks need to be customised to the selection criteria, and that selection criteria needs to be at least good enough to hover around the break even point.  The EC's are very good for that.

A progression up and down the blocks in some d'alembert fashion is recommended, with a return to block 1 each time you go 1 unit in profit for any session.

For example you could have 5 blocks of 5 progressive bets:

1) 1.2.3.4.5
2) 2.4.6.8.10
3) 4.8.12.16.20
4) 8.16.24.32.40
5) 16.32.48.64.80

D'alembert up and down the individual blocks as well as up and down between the blocks, always reverting to block 1 bet 1 whenever you go plus 1.


This is a very simplistic example of the type of progression that can get you the minimum profit on each round or session.
 

Quote from: horus on April 11, 2015, 07:49:02 PM
Sam, it was originally a challenge set out for JL to see if he could defeat Bayes RNG simulator. Then Skakus joined in the thread to see how his bet selection and MM fared. He did pretty good by the look of things.  (must have been a 'ringer' like those reserve dogs who skate up by half the track [smiley]aes/wink.png[/smiley])

Here is the link to the thread.

http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=9780.10;wap2

cheers

I think skakus was always going to beat Bayes' RNG. Not because he was a ringer, but because he had a winning formula. [smiley]cactus/Untitled-1.gif[/smiley]

Go for it horus!

I wish you the best of luck with your challenge, but 500 placed bets is not a worthy target amount if you hope to learn much from your efforts.

You should raise the bar to 5000 at least. 

Quote from: The Crow on March 21, 2015, 06:11:46 AM
I currently have a gaming partner, and we are always on alert.

The Crow

You should call yourselves Heckle and Jeckle. [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]

I too have the money; in fact having the money is why I decided not to gamble professionally.

I choose to play roulette for entertainment and because I'm very good at it. So I get entertained and usually walk away with some extra money in my pocket to spend on the things I truly enjoy.

There is a saying that should be everybody's rule number 1, 'never bet with scared money'. If you adhere to that rule you will enjoy your time at the tables and not worry about the rest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSLlZh9yelk

Quote from: XXVV on March 08, 2015, 07:50:13 PM

In due course I will provide access and invitation to some of my material via a new Investment Blogsite/ Website but will restrict access for the roulette bet to my personal playing partners only; in other words, less than half a dozen worldwide. Reason for this is that my work is very complex and really needs one on one explanation, practice, participation and application with instruction over a sustained period, probably at least one month with frequent review. My way of striking a fair deal is to keep costs to participate relatively low but negotiate a good royalty contract, or split profits while playing together.

I will delete infinity if you're not all very careful!! [smiley]cactus/r000.gif[/smiley]

This is just more dribble from you, ignatus.

You have a good body of work behind you. Now it's time to lift your game...[smiley]cactus/am000.gif[/smiley]

LOL! 

Nice one Sputnik!

Quote from: Kav on January 10, 2015, 08:07:49 AM
Where did the 50%-50% rule go?

Surat Al-'Aĥzāb 33:1


O Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise.




In other words, screw your infidel forum rules, Mr J can do whatever he bloody well likes.


...thanks Victor.

Ironically, people that use the term "old school" generally never finished school.