You ever tried sports arbitrage betting? I found out it existed today and I based a betting system myself before I even knew it existed http://betselection.cc/sports-betting-forum/betting-system/

See this video




Sports arbitrage betting guide

Find odds that both are 2 and higher for each. (see pic) Bet is 1 X 2: So one bet on both 1 & 2


You'll win either team winning, only lose if draw.


Let's say you bet 10€


Game 1. First single bet --> Brynäs (1): 10€ * 2.25  = 22.5€ (if win 2.5€) --- Second single bet --> Luleå (2) 10€ * 2.55 =  25.5€ (if win 5.5€)

Game 2. First single bet -->Modo (1): 10€ * 2.25 = 22.5€ (if win 2.5€) - Second single bet --> Färjestad (2) 10€ *2.55 = 25.5€ (if win 5.5€)

Total win = 5-11 € (if no draw)

Be added here: http://www.uxsoftware.com/pages/links.html ?

Quote from: albalaha on December 28, 2012, 12:35:05 PM
Are you talking of my system?

"Kings system" was betting on the same EC, but with martingale. (I saw on youtube) this is same system, but with different progression...

I don't use to play on ECs but this seems to be a very good method


Progression +2 for each loss: 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27,29,32....... is the progression line.  (no progression when hit) and wait for 2 hits or 2+2 hits or 3 hits in a row then reset. (2+2 hits: You get 2 hits then loss... continue progression and get 2 more hits then recoverd)


Best thing it can survive many losses and recover from 2+2 hits or 3 hits in a row etc


I always play on the same EC. This is the "Kings system" modified.

Quote from: SamNL on December 27, 2012, 08:36:57 PM
I don't like the progression though, you can get in the hole quick and with the earnings, it's hard to get out of the hole.

True,

Quote from: Ralph on December 27, 2012, 09:58:44 PM
Numbers comes in swarms, but it is not a static phenomenia.  Repeaters yes, I won most from it.  We never know which to repeate, we have to gueess, and if we do it well, we win.

I've seen this too! See my new strategy "Cluster Star" takes advantage of this phenomenon 


http://betselection.cc/straight-up/cluster-star/msg5403/#msg5403

Only did a short test on this one, on RNG. But it seemed to work very well. I've seen happen often at RNG, numbers hit in clusters. What i mean by this is they hit within a short range. So, taking advantage of this "flaw" I always use to play on Zero. (you can play on any other number with the same principle) I use the (misinterpetation?) of the Star-progression: 1,2,3,5,8 (stop) OK, so I wait for the first hit without betting, then start a 18-step progression, then stop. If no hit I wait for the next zero to appear, and start the next level in progression for 18 steps, then stop and so on... This method only betting 18 times after a hit takes advantage of numbers hitting in clusters on RNG. Don't know if the same principle can be applied to live wheels? Anyway, if you get a hit, and are satisfied with your bankroll you can reset and restart. Otherwise go for two hits. This was the original method of the star-progression - play same bet until 2 hits. (Risk vs. Reward)


So, summarize this method.


*Always bet 18 times (then stop) after a hit.


*Go to next level in progression 1,2,3,5,8 after each 18 spins without a hit, if you get a hit and are satisfied with your bankroll you can reset and restart. (Otherwise go for two hits with the same bet).


*If 18x18x18x18x18 spins without a hit -Quit-




Warning - This method has not been tested enough, so more testing is needed -

Alright nice Live roulette can be slow perhaps playing this method. It works good with RNG also. I'll play this for real tomorrow .


Thanks for testing!

I can't guarantee it will work. Just did some experiments. Static bets don't use to work in the long run...

5 units on street 10/12, 13/15, 22/24, 25/27 (perhaps not a Multiple bet?) 
2 units on Zero

Bet 9 random numbers (I've had some lucky runs with that)


Other Not so good/effective "multiple bets":


2 units on Zero
5 units on Street 4/6, 7/9, 16/18, 19/21, 28/30, 31/33


Another one:


2 units on Zero
5 units on column 1 & 3
5 units on Low
5 units on Red
5 units on Odd

I tried some sportbetting . Betting only one game (all low odds,20+ games). Lost almost all games. But I think the odds are manipulated. Better to bet AGAINST the lowest odds, against common sense. I will try that next time. I will bet against the odds. On all games. (only single 1 game/bet,20+ games) Always betting on the highest odds gives more profit also.


I'm not sure it would work. Atleast I lost when betting according to the odds, so why should the opposite not work?

Quote from: SamNL on December 27, 2012, 02:12:41 PM
I will test it later today on Dublinbet. Will report back with results.

Thanks 

Thanks Haven't played it on the uneven doublestreets, but it should work just fine with them aswell!

OK I dare to say this strategy works.

Track the last 5 doublestreets hit, until all last 5 hits have been on the same three doublestreets (if it repeats on same two doublestreets, zero hit etc, track until 3rd doublstreet hit)

Now, start betting on the 3 doublstreets that haven't been hit for 5 spins with progression.

3 Double Streets (each)1,1,2,4,6,8,16,32


Works both on RNG and live. Haven't lost a single game so far. It's slow winner but I think it's one of the most "safe" systems.  It takes advantage of randomness.

+3036 in 1500 live spins.