i would love to know more for the actual bet selection...very curious...thanks for the info

see attached excel..with your numbers betting high..you can change formulas depend on what EC betting and how many spin so you can get count of <w> and <l>  right..hope it helps...it is not reverse eng...

i don't just from start...spin 1 i bet so spin 2 no bet pin 3 bet spin 4 and so on as i wrote earlier

  no...you get labby and start bet spin 1, bet spin2 , spin 3 no bet, bet spin 4    ,no bet spin 5,6,7, bet spin 8,no bet 9,10,11,12,13,14,15 , bet spin 16,then start count again as after 16th spin is spin 17 so for your count spin 17 will be spin 1,spin18 will be spin 2 and so on...

what's the big deal ....given session by alabala,what you do just bet spin 1,2,4,8,16 when you go to spin 16 start count again 1,2,4,8,16 and so on ... till the end....you should get "w"235/"l"265 it should work for any sequence

fair enough Sam but i am talking strike rate ,bunch of 37 spins when i test with excell RNG ,live spins, random org,RNG data i have from my play strikes are similar then you get on RNG real money and does not hit so day by day this feelin grows that fair might not be that fair even with ~sha~ story and fair play checks...oh well or maybe is my brain

what it is you get at least 1 hit in 37 spins betting max 3 numbers and 3 numbers not all time....i do not know it is like woman tits you see them nice firm and all that then you say to yourself it must be me surgery going on..

hi hope you doing well..i would like to ask simple question,   say you have system to play on roulette you do test this system and shows similar hits on data taken from random org,live wheel spin data and RNG spins But when you come to play on RNG does not show stats you have had before...what would you think RNG is cheating or you just hit run from hell note that when you play your system on RNG real money shows constant bad runs..thanks for your time

so that xxvv or whatever name has got did play stuff system on stuff data and won.....that's what i call professional gambler 

http://www.highexistence.com/this-will-mindfuck-you-the-double-slit-experiment/


we know that we know nothing

so sad to see no one comes around for cup....Sam i miss your videos when you going to make new one with some new staff you play..good luck

lets say it in short WF system is not better than any other method  no edge gained or whatever ...Bayes great dedication and thanks for your time coding it.....

just question @XXVV what is the biggest draw down you have seen flat bet ...thanks

thanks XXVV for time and dedication....

some more testing