However, the biggest problem remains progression, we can wait a long time for negative results, but they can reach virtual limits, and do not go to equilibrium.
It can last up to several thousand spins

Hello Warrior
I have recently tested positive progression a little, but unfortunately if bet selection without edge, they are not able to overcome the house edge.
I even found selections on 2 dozens with positive progression, which withstood 500 k spins, but on the wheel without zero.
If there is a zero in my simulations, everything loses.

I have several options for very aggressive versions of positive progression to be tested, but rather they will not bring long term profit.

One more theoretical consideration, once in another forum someone carried out tests that one of the optimal selections is to play.
  We follow 11 streets when only one of the coldest stays, once we play that 11 streets for one time.
Negative progression would be meaningless, but you can use positive to increase the edge.
By sticking hitnrun on wheels live, it could be a whole strategy.

that's  from PB topic  on diffrent  forum


That  should not be too negative.
I carried out some tests
I just like to know why something can work, and why not something.
I played 1000 spins with Andre Chass with an idea, i.e. I played against two paterns using 1-1-3 progression.
What I noticed was that for the first 500 spins I was on the plus side of 17 units, then in the course of 100 spins a few losing progressions, the next 300 spins climbing on the plus and the next 100 spins lost again.
I ended the end of the game with +6 units, but the tests were carried out on a wheel without a zero.

What is the theory behind this?
The losses occur in a large extent in clusters, which is why there is a good chance that we will end up in a longer period in which roulette will not adapt to our rare pattern.
An example is CHT which uses rare patern and win periods are longer than losing clusters.
In a way, this would confirm the possibility of hitnrun strategy to avoid variance.

But in a very long time it may not keep up, because sometimes we should hit the clusters periods.


Theory  is that , if we using  hitnrun , for  long  time  we could playing  in favorite situation .
Becose losing periods are shorter than  winning ones.

 This topic was one of the most interesting in this forum, MIKE's claim in the first post concerned that after three losses we have a delicate edge, playing against such an event, after 3 losses.
I do not know what it looks like in reality and I was thinking how to bite it.
If I would have to come to this.
I would play so I would like to table with la partage rule.
I would  play only Black, the triger would be 3 times Red, and one time black against the reds series
If the edge really occurs then I would add 4 step positive progressions , one  step for  one  trigger.
5
11
24
55


But I'm really curious if the edge really exists
This question is already addressed to MIKE

This strategy had a lot of potential.
But you need a tracker for it.
Playing manually does not have time for calculations and simultaneous betting in online live casino.

What is your strategy that you have repaired?
I did not buy your programming, I think this is a new trend
The scamers that seles stuff

Of course not that progression is the key.
I do not believe that bet selection has changed anything, I think these charts were a scam to sell the app

Once again I looked at this topic, surprised me the size of the profit, over 15 times session  Bankroll in 50k spins.
I really do not think it's a good bet selection, but progression is key.
But it is hard for me to believe that such a simple thing can generate such a profit.

As far as I remember, the algorithm showed 5 numbers.
The progression was probably 30 steps, and the stoploss 3000 units.
Progression was the usual Martingale on 5 numbers.
If someone has the ability to program, can check in longrun, simpler and less costly progression.
Bet selection is last double street and stoploss 600 units.
  I would be very surprised to see that the longterm profit, but it may turn out to be wrong.

Thanks for the answer.
Once some of the users mentioned this, it may have been just a legend.

Hi
I have such a question related to casino industry in Vegas
We know that high rollers players can sometimes count on a return of% from their loses.
But in extreme cases when they generate high turnover they can count on a zero-free game on European roulette?
I know this topic was already raised a long time ago.
We know that Vegas have a wheel on European rules only the stakes are bigger there.
Maybe someone has heard of such a possibility in Europe?

From my old manual simulations, it appears that playing 2 last dosens is very stable selection, even if it does not give an edge in longrun, very rarely the graph goes below zero.

In addition to this I have a positive progression, which wins in the longrun on a wheel without zero, but unfortunately is not able to overcome the border of 2.7% house edge.

My friend sent me a simulation of the last two dozen on a wheel without a zero.
Stake 10 units

What are the indicators you choose when choosing numbers?
You can simply describe with the words bet selection.
Is it a complicated process to which you need an algorithm?