Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - ozon

#31
General Discussion / Re: Making the -2,7 to 0
August 01, 2017, 05:32:51 PM
Unfortunately, this does not change almost anything.
9000 spins does not prove anything.
I have simulations where I have 10000 bets not spins and I'm zero, but later it goes very fast.
Such a strategy that very well behaved, was always playing the last two dozen . It very  good stable bet  selection.
#32

It was about progression, she is long enough to not pass any spin. It is so constructed.
I'm not against triggers, if you have a strategy that thanks to bet selection it improves accuracy.
I played the game for this very long progression I played black.
Leaving some spin at it just did not calculate, even playing live online roulette would have to be done in a group because, as I wrote not workable for one person would be playing a 500 spins session without interruption.
#33
I've never been more interested in blackjack.
But lately I've just read that using single deck blackjack and using a basic strategy will reduce house edge to 0.17%
I even learned that my country in the BM casinos unfortunately do not have this variety of blackjack.
I have positive progression on using double dozen bets I can generate profit on wheels nozero
I'm currently trying to translate this progression into EC bets, but I have not done any RX simulations yet, so I do not know.
I know it works with 1.50 odds but I do not know how to use that to odds 2.00 odds.
#34
The progression of which I wrote unfortunately is not too good for the BM casino, sometimes you need 400-500 spins to get out plus in very heavy sessions.
Calculations are also complicated and you have to play each spin.
#35
I found the site with the simulation d'alambert
https://bettingsimulation.com/

I lost BR 3000 units in 3500 spins, the highest bet was 97 units.

I have some good patents that will improve the usual dalambert and maybe something to keep from losing 3000 units and be a plus

Betvoyager is an honest casino when it comes to numbers.
But disconnections increase the edge of the casino to a huge percentage of what makes it completely impossible to play there.

I even have a strategy that in the longrunie beats the casino  nozero even with a commission of 10% of the winnings, but the exclusion completely ruins it.
Edge is generated so small that it does not win on roulette with zero
#36
I just have progressions, similar to Albalaha.
Prepared for the heaviest sessions, is unfortunately to slow on the live wheel.
The simulations look great,
But RNG gives such a series that mathematics has nothing to say.
I played this progression really much, betvoyager was not the worst.
Software netent like royal panda. Crazy sessions. Unbelievable deviations.
I does not save the session, but after my progression and spins amounts sometimes I can judge how bad the session was.
And  when  i lose  session after session, i  know  is  something  wrong.
#37
Blue Angel
You count on less deviation in subsequent spins, but it may not happen.
I experienced worse sessions on betvoyager RNG, where for 500 spin deviations were unreal, maybe on the live wheel would be to avoid.
But RNG will destroy such progressions in a moment
#38
Online Casinos / Re: AVOID BETVOYAGER AT ALL COSTS
July 27, 2017, 07:08:53 PM
Has anyone counted what the real advantage of the casino on Nozero Betvoyager roulette?
We know that they take 10% of the winnings, but what advantage does this generate for the casino, I'm thinking about percentages at best not taking into account the frequent disconnections, because the disconnections cause the house edge to increase to a huge percentage.
I want  know the best variant.
#39
But with screenshots you can see that you are using some kind of progression, what is the stoploss of your progression, if it is long and involves alot of units, such tests do not give  a picture of the strategy.
#40
Some days ago, I tried a certain approach.
Bet selection I used was the simplest, after 2 falls of the same color, I played the second color once.
Target profit + 7 units, stop lose -14 units. When i reach TP or SL end session.
The length of the session if I did not settle TP or SL was always 100 placed bets.
The results were positive after several sessions.
My tests were not long, but can such an approach give a longrun profit?
#41
I just started to play that way.
3 sessions won at a fast pace.
Bet selection
Vdw combined with after 2 losing bets wait for virtual win, thus avoiding the series of loses
Target profit +7 units, stop loss -14 units.
I have no skill to program it, I play it manually
#42
This is all in theory, all the simulations done on the RX are in fact swept in a moment. In online RNG.
I treat this as a hobby, do not see the possibility of win in longrun with online casino RNG. Disconnetions and many weird things. Online roulette in reality works like slotmachine not real wheel.
#43
I also do not know why the results are better.
I tried after 1 lose and after 3 losses, but only after2 losses works.
I play RX RNG and after 2 losses and virtual win results ar positive, with hitnrun even more.
#44
I just tested yesterday's options, manually played several sessions, and reached new high 166 units, using hitnrun.
Is it possible for hitnrun to make a difference?
#45
I did not use the second option, I quickly made only simulations for first option from your post.