Hi Blue Angel
I did simulations of 200k spins with the first option, ie after one lose wait for virtual win.
Biggest high was 50 units after 50k spins, max drowdawn -300 units, and ended -110 units.

Yesterday I did something else I decided to use fallacy like hitnrun is.
I use RX
Bet selection is what I described 2 loss and virtual win
Bankroll 100 units
Session target profit +7 units, stoplose -14 units
I always ended sessions when reach TP or SL, and reset spins.
To my surprise after several sessions I doubled my starting bankroll.
The tests were not long, but the results surprised me a little

A few days ago I made simulations.
I only played red, after 2 loss wait for virtual win.
To my surprise after 500k spins and was about 500 units on plus.
Biggest high was after 150k spins 670 units
Max drawdawn from top was 350 units.
In the first 150k the trend was increasing, after that trend was neutral.

Observe, even if there is a slight edge, we can not use any real progression.
  I do not know what progression is able to withstand the drawdown of 350 units.

Can you explain your money management?
I think that is the key to your success.
I mean to present the worst scenario, how deep we go down.

Hi
I have read on your website that the bankroll needed for the game is 2000 units.
What drowdawn can we expect, and what% of profits we can expect per day and month?

I played today for a while, fun mode.
  Bet Selection is Vdw
Progression is MIke's theory, s, we play flat and we lose 3 times
Then we start recowery mode
1-2-3-5-8-13
Play to win in recovery mode, we totally ignore 3 lost bets that we played flat.
If we win on1 or 2 or 3 units we are back to the 1 unit flat
If we win on 5 units we stay one more spin same stake.
If we win on 8 or 13 we back one step down.
If we lose last step we start for begining.
I have not done simulations yet, but it is a bit complicated.

Hi Audiokinesis
I played for the last days for money only for black, using the progression of Mike's
After 3,5k spins im -200 units.
The reds  series are much more likely than they were to appear.
  I have worse and worse experiences with online RNG roulette.
Even if I have strategies that generate profit in simulations, the casino will destroy me in a moment. Bad variance is much more than it should be if you play for real money.
I treats roulette as a hobby, but more and more frustrates me.

http://betselection.cc/even-chance-8/how-to-get-an-edge-flat-betting-(in-theory)/msg22774/#msg22774

Hi Nick
On another forum I recently gave a positive Mike's progression simulations.
In the near future I will try to play for BV no zero real money.
  Vdw will bet selection, and use Mike's progression.
I want to see what happens.
My only worry will be disconnections.

For the last few days I played something like this.
Bet selection was one dozen.
Always follow the last to catch the trend, and a series of 4 or more.
Progression
Positive 3 step 1-2-4 after win the third step reset.
What happened to my surprise
This is spins / results
1000 +151
1000 -63
1000 +102
1000 +72
500 +97
1000-6
200 +23
1000 + 18
1000 +81
500 +58
1000 + 33
1000 +2
1000-78
1000 -77

Here's a question for more experienced players, whether this 3-step positive progression can generate an edge?
All spins played on Nozero roulette, the results of the first 10 k spins are amazing, but the last two sessions are not so much,
Is it possible that RNG specially manipulated the results and now will be a series of many losers of the session, whether such progression can generate profit in the longrun and it is just a deviation?

Where is the edge, what is the mathematical formula of the superiority of your system over flat betting
  At the end and so you have to have good bets, if you have good performance bets with  positive  yield , you don't need any system.

I played about 2 k spins with selection, always against the third position  from the end.
using regression
Drawing on advice from Sputnik and Kattila, I'm waiting for Virtual lost as a trigger and play only 4 spins after trigger.
This resulted in the separation of regression 2 Levels
4-2-3-4 and win after first level and wait for the virtual lost and start next level 5-6-7-1.

After all this spins up 400 units, but last 500 spins was on zero.

I play against RNG, I think the results of real spins could be better.

I know that I will not bring anything new to the subject, but today played this method, on Nozero BV RNG with good results.
Bet selection same like in this topic.

MM regression
4-2-3-4-5-6-7-1-1 ....

We play 4 attempts for session, stop session after 4 loss of first bet, or after we reach and win level of regression with 7 units.

  I have yet to try the way of what  writes Sputnik, wait for the virtual lost and only then start with the game.

Crow is not right, we do not  use different EC
I think
Event No.1 is 2 recent decisions
Event No.2 is last decision and  2nd before the last decision
Event No.3 is last decision and 3rd before the  last decision
........

We use only the R / B and compares past decisions to the last.
It requires practice, because in the beginning it looks complicated.

Very interesting concept, the most interesting is that we can earn flat bet.
I understand the whole principle of event No. 1, run and changes from last 5 spins but what is in event No. 2, 3.4, I do not understand this part, if in use in event No. 1 Reds and blacks, last 5 results, in event nr. 2 use the same results but how? All the time we use only the reds and blacks in all events. Or in use in the event no.1 first 5 spins, in the event no.2 next 5 spins, and so on?
There are a few unknowns, which would rather clarify rather than make mistakes.

Today I played with some modification of regression.
2-1-2-4-8-16-32 stop
I know RNG is joke, but today and reach first 7step win after 720 spins, I finished after the game because I was in a big hole with a bankroll, I want test further the kind of staking, but the results on RNG BV nozero are funny, if you start to play progressive staking strategy is destroyed in a moment, by a series from hell. Even if your strategy should work for some time . Not  go  straight   down.