I know, I saw the graphics, and I know that  lost happen, slingshot in willhill starts with 0.1 euro, but to make a bet in such a short time, it is almost impossible for the higher levels of progression. For the tables with the dealer, you have more time, but larger limits. I think the minimum bankroll for this method is 5 times session bankroll, this is 15k units, because it can happen loss after loss.

Unfortunately, today, played only 3 hours, lost the 3000 Units Bankroll , Roulette WillHill slingshot.

I think, however, that  progression  better works with dozens .
As played Kattila
Still think that it will be a loser in long  run.

Hi . I have the idea to exploit Kattila way, the EC bets.
Way will be a little more aggressive but it can modify at will.
Progressions when we play will show the EC, then play 1 unit for this event if we win we raise stakes +1, if the lose we play for the same stakes, we play up to 3 times if you lose 3 times in a row, waiting for the virtual win, after a virtual win we play -1units than befor.
To use triggers, wait for 10 or more repetitions of the same Ec, the wait opposite color, this is our first virtual win then begins to bet, profit target 10 units on the trigger, I do not know how stoplose fix, maybe - 300 units for the sessions.

Today I read on another forum about hybrid progression.
It is not my idea, but we can try.
Played today, this strategy on roulette Nozero BV
After we open new session, waiting until the first 19-20 spins,  if we haven't  6 in a row doubeldozens 1-2, when we begin to trigger bet on dozen1 and 2 with positive progresion after win we going up , after lose the start at begining
1-1
2-2
3-3
4-4
5-5
6-6

If we win 6 steps in the progression reset, and start with 1-1 unit, if we are to any positive territory we finish sessions and open new window.
This is not the end of progression if we are - 42 units begin to use progressions + 1, -1
  If we are -42 units we play 2-2 4-4 6-6 8-8 10-10 12-12
If we are - 126 units 3-3 6-6 ............
    -252 4-4 8-8 12-12 .........
and so on
if we win on the high step just reduce the degree
BR session is 1,000 units.

Albalaha is right almost only bet365 has options for this type of bet
Putting every 10 minutes you pay larger commissions bookmaker.
Better option if the idea that you can hit as many bets in a row is the lay 0-0 on Betfair, if you're so good at typing everything is possible

This strategy is there to reach the people money.

In my post I write about positive d'Alembert, raising the stakes after Win,  decrease after Lose

If you know that negative progressions are not working, maybe we'll try positive on these bad sessions, we use safe breaks after 3 L in wait for a virtual W
Progression is positive, after Win +1, -1 after Lose
Always we reset the progressions when we are on plus
Still do not know what the highest level of progression define, maybe 10 or 12 prog progression as the tallest how we play.
Bankroll which we use, is 1,000 units
Maybe you need stoplose at some stage.

Only theoretically. If you know that in 3700  spins RTM works, maybe we should use the very delicate progressions, so raising the stake only if we are -20 losing bets from the positive balance.
Using Albalaha variance  avoid  strategy .Virtual win after three losses.
Progression looks like this
0   to  -20L 1 unit
-20L to-40L 2 units
-40L to-60L 3 units
................
Max bet 10 units

Stoplose -1000 units

Whenever we have a positive balance reset the progression
I do not think it worked, but maybe this is a step in the right direction.

Hello Nick
I have a question about the simulation 1000000 spins at the second forum, is there, the maximum drawdown is more than 5k, with max stake 128 unit.
Did you tried to play it with stoplose let say 1000 or 600 units, then the graph looks like a positively or negatively?
Thanks for any reply

This is only a concept, when we have such a strong progressions as Blue Angel, we can make improvements, let's assume that we play RNG, we begin to look forward to sessions waiting for inballance of 10 hits in first 20 spins (let's say 14-4 or 15-5 in the EC bets) then start betting on the side with low hits. We play only those sessions.
Then we are already at the start plus 10 positions in the first 37 spins, which are the first stage of the Blue Angel progression. The next improvement is used safebreaks, such as virtual win after 4 losers. The session ends when you first get out on the plus side. We enable the new sessions, and begin to look for a new trigger.

After 4 loses wait  for virtual win.

Quote from Bayes:

The progression is based on starting from a base of 1 unit and multiplying by around 10% - 12% to get the value of the next stake. Here is a version I just coded which is very similar to the Holloway progression using a percentage of 11.5% which gives approximately the same values and the same number of steps.

The error in the Holloway progression comes from rounding. You can see the same thing here: The middle column is the calculation unrounded and in the right column the numbers have been round DOWN to the nearest whole number. Notice that from step 27 (18u) to step 28 (21u) there is an increase of 3 units, but from step 28 to step 29 (23u) there is an increase of only 2 units!

Depending on how the rounding is done there will usually be some error like this, but it won't make a lot of difference. You could always change the values in the Holloway progression slightly to make the steps between values consistent.

1   1.115       1
2   1.243       1
3   1.386       1
4   1.546       1
5   1.723       1
6   1.922       1
7   2.143       2
8   2.389       2
9   2.664       2
10   2.970       2
11   3.311       3
12   3.692       3
13   4.117       4
14   4.590       4
15   5.118       5
16   5.707       5
17   6.363       6
18   7.095       7
19   7.911       7
20   8.821       8
21   9.835       9
22   10.966      10
23   12.227      12
24   13.633      13
25   15.201      15
26   16.949      16
27   18.898      18
28   21.072      21 << 3 from 18 to 21
29   23.495      23 << 2 from 21 to 23
30   26.197      26
31   29.209      29
32   32.568      32
33   36.314      36
34   40.490      40
35   45.146      45
36   50.338      50
37   56.127      56
38   62.581      62
39   69.778      69
40   77.803      77
41   86.750      86
42   96.726      96
43   107.850     107
44   120.253     120
45   134.082     134
46   149.501     149

Haha, then this guy deduced that I'm Rolex-watch.
Im from Poland,you can  check my IP

I think that this is not a bulletproof strategy and at some point you lose 400 units, but I think its being able to earn more than lose.

You can try, to play so that when a particular ec rolled two times the trigger will be, that it falls the 3rd time. You play so all ec at the same time, it will reduce the variance bad streak of one ec, as a progression you go to a higher level only when you are -3 at this level and  reduce the stakes only when you when you're  +3 at this level.  BR  400 units