Wiesbaden  T1    8/03/2017

Money T 

it's for  H and L

An other  for Hight and Low

It lacks just one  "win" Before last line

B
R
B
R
R       R  C  R  C                              prognosis
R       R  R  C  R                              1  2  3  4
B       C  C  C  R                              R  R  R  B          bet red
B       R  C  C  C                              R  B  R  B            no bet                    lost
B       R  R  C  C                              R  B  B  R           nb
B       R  R  R  C                              R  R  B  B           nb
B       R  R  R  R                              R  R  R  B           bet red
R       C  C  C  C                             B  R  R  B           nb                                win
B       C  R  R  R                              B  B  R  R          nb
B       R  C  R  R                              B  B  B  R            bet black
R       C  C  R  C                             R  B  R  B          nb                                  lost
B       C  R  R  C                             B  R  R  B          nb
B       R  C  R  R                             B  B  B  B             bet black
B       R  R  C  R                             R  R  R  B           bet red                          win
R       C  C  C  R                            B  B  B  R            bet black
R                                                                                                                 lost

Moglizu 

It is you who insults several members of this forum.
By claiming that they have an IQ under devellope .

  Thank you Badger

As laughable as "moglizu" who discovers his own method .

You should find as there is only one way to do this.

I give it to those who believe in it.  ( So without me)

B
B      R  C  C  R     ev 1
B      R  R  C  C     ev 2
R      C  C  C  R     ev 3
R      R  C  C  C     ev 4

Exact .

It will be the same on any figure.

What I posted is strictly accurate.

Here are the 4 events of this figure:  N N N N N

évent 1 :  R R R R

évent 2 : R R R R

évent 3: R R R R

évent 4 : R R R R

I do not think I'm wrong

Apparently we need a C.

Quote from: moglizu on March 02, 2017, 02:39:59 AM
It seems impossible to me that no one understood the method.
Ok let s see...

Let s just take for example ( this is what you are asking... examples) only EVENT no1.
EVENT no1 is comparison of the last 2 spins(R/B).

We have R R  this is a RUN (because from R it went to R again)
So we have

EVENT NO1
   R    C
   X

The next spin is R R (B) ... so we have to update the chart so it will be

EVENT NO1
  R   C
  X   X     ( We are puting X under the R(Run) or the C(Change)

next spin is R R  B (R)

EVENT NO1

  R  C
  X  X
      X

So until now we have 1 RUN and 2 CHANGES by comparing in every new spin the last 2 outcomes.

when we have RR=RUN  when we have BB=RUN when we have RB or BR = CHANGE.

Now this was ONLY the EVENT NO1

add 3 more events of the R/B.(Read my previous posts)
That all of them are being updating with the new spin...

And then make the deviations correction when the bet selection on either RED or BLACK will correct most of them.

I really don t believe that I had to make examples in order to be understood.
My previous posts had explained everything in detail.

______________________

It takes only 4 spins to constitute the first event.

It does not matter.

Yes, but you only showed one.

This is what he will answer you