The only way for "controlling" and reduce the variance is the arcsine approach,at least at Baccarat.
No at roulette, having perfect symmetry.
I spoke already about that in the past, but it seems that no member followed this idea,even if Google can teach some principles (not all needed details,of course!)
Even if the control of the variance is difficult but possible,it's not easy at all, also to find a MM that works.
"Works" means:no huge BKR,no ten hours a day at the table,no very very low wins.
Personnally I tried to control the variance with statistics,agglomerations,cluster of agglomerations,figure of 1,2,3,cluster of intermittences,very big variance and so on but I must admit that I failed......like the most people writing on this Forum,apart may be Asym that has an important knowledge of Basics,a smart approach to the game and a huge creativity.
No at roulette, having perfect symmetry.
I spoke already about that in the past, but it seems that no member followed this idea,even if Google can teach some principles (not all needed details,of course!)
Even if the control of the variance is difficult but possible,it's not easy at all, also to find a MM that works.
"Works" means:no huge BKR,no ten hours a day at the table,no very very low wins.
Personnally I tried to control the variance with statistics,agglomerations,cluster of agglomerations,figure of 1,2,3,cluster of intermittences,very big variance and so on but I must admit that I failed......like the most people writing on this Forum,apart may be Asym that has an important knowledge of Basics,a smart approach to the game and a huge creativity.