thanks

Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Sputnik on February 02, 2013, 09:55:26 AM
sogget why do you continue with this topic? just curios!
Can't you see that Ignatus have much to learn about the game.
Quote from: spike on February 01, 2013, 09:29:46 PM
what's the difference. If you won ten sessions of $10 each,
they take $1 from each session. Or they take $10 from the
total at the end of 10 sessions. Its the same amount.
Quote from: ignatus on February 01, 2013, 11:05:48 AM
I won 4000, playing live. Never got a very bad streak so far, 7-8 spins without hit at most. TRUE. There may be extreme cases, but then one can play with stoploss at 4 losses in a row to prevet that.
Think it's bad people claiming this strategy won't work when they haven't played it.
Quote from: Gizmotron on February 01, 2013, 06:42:09 AM
Here's the really big deal. It doesn't matter if what I say is right. People are getting it. I have already opened a Pandores box. Randomness studies leads to solutions that offer successes.
Quote from: TwoCatSam on January 31, 2013, 05:34:27 PMit can go X + X too
ignatus
Beware of thinking it can't go X. It can usually go X + 1 and will do it.
You're one of the good guys! Just be careful.
Sam
Quote from: Gizmotron on January 31, 2013, 05:54:07 PM
Here's a trigger for you. Count to ten, open your wallet, grab all you money, light it on fire, and scratch your head. Next, take the clue.
Quote from: Gizmotron on January 31, 2013, 10:40:21 PM
In all that there is, there is one tactic that must be dealt with. There must be a constant vigilance with regards to what is currently happening. Wishful thinking leads to disaster.
The secret to beating this is in being aware of the current states. You must know what characteristics of randomness are working. That can be discussed for any betting group. So if it where me, that is where discussion might be the greatest value .
Quote from: ignatus on January 30, 2013, 09:36:45 AM
How can it be 816u? Explain more, (Last step is reaching table limit-)
Quote from: Bayes on January 30, 2013, 08:34:23 AM
Two in a row or 2 in 3 doesn't really qualify as 'hot', and in any case, spins are independent so a statement like "given event X, what is the chance of event Y?" is exactly the same as "what is the chance of event Y?". In other words the "given event X" part is redundant.
Quote from: Ophis on January 29, 2013, 02:39:51 PM
seeing from replays it looks like im the only one who is into it... so won't ask if anyone understand it.