I've been winning well and regular for the past few years playin baccrats fulltime using a negative progression with the trigger. So, I guess I'm just on the rights ide of variance and haven't buck up against the "long run" yet right, hey hey
Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Jimske on April 14, 2018, 08:08:17 PM
This looks a lot like (or exactly like) "Pairs" by I forget who. You can bet the sleeping pair OR the dominant pair OR the pair that looks llike it is catching up.
Quote from: james on October 11, 2016, 09:39:18 PM
I could not come up with a bet selection that gives positive return using this progression in baccarat and craps. It busts often and the small returns is offset by the loss of 175 units when it busts. If you are playing at a $20 table, you will lose $1750 if it busts.
I do not have access to sports betting since it is not allowed in USA except Nevada. Sports betting is not allowed since authorities believe that betting will impact the integrity of the game!
Quote from: DoctorSudoku on October 11, 2016, 11:30:37 PM
Soxfan,
Just curious -- did you get this idea from Barstow's book? He discussed a similar parlay method in his book (his parlay sequence had slightly different numbers and had 9 steps).
Quote from: Tomla on October 09, 2016, 08:30:14 AM
( only the dysfunctional could lose)