I still think that betting flat ain't gonna feed the buildog, but I'll eyeball this style and see if it is better than mine at pickin off the backs to backs win, hey hey.

No bottle, no balls, no bankroll, no shot. It's that simple, baby, hey hey.

Quote from: AsymBacGuy on May 31, 2016, 01:19:57 AM
Probably with my over selected BS tested on millions of shoes, your win rate will be close to 99.999999999%. 

as.

I think you could get 98-99 percents winning shoe with that 20 step parlay style, hey hey.

Quote from: goez on May 31, 2016, 01:04:21 AM
Hi sox fan, 
What is your strike rate within the first 6 steps of your progression. Just wondering if it would get better result front end loaded.

I always like the back load cuz I like being able to capture more units profits the deeper I go in the progression, hey hey.

With m y current 13 step parlay progression I'm buckin up against a 95% win rate. So, I get clipped for 500 unit in progressions bust out every 100 shoe, so I can win well and regular by capturing just 10 units profits on the 95 winning shoe and I average better than that, hey hey.

If a cat can't capture a parlay once in 20 try he should quit the baccarats and sell pencil out of a tin cup on a streets corner some place. So, maybe try the following style, almost unbreakable, hey hey!

1-1-2-2-3-4-5-7-9-12-16-22-29-39-52-69-92-123-164-218 units bets
3-2-4-2-3-3-2-3-2-2-2-4-3-4-4-3-3-4-4-2 units profits

Does yer style require the 3000 units bankroll? And, what is the price, hey hey?

I enjoy the entertainments, hey hey.

There is an Armenian cat on a member only dice forum that has come up with a progression style that is, imho, nearly unbreakable. That's cuz it covers the mathematical expectation of a certain event popping within so many toss of the cubes. So, if the action at the dices table always play out according to expectation then he would never bust a progression. But there are practical reasons it's hard to play in that you need a minimum 10 thousands unit bankroll, and they stones to make the max bet of slightly more than 800 unit. And ya gotta have access to a joint that gives you a nice fat spread between min-mx bets, hey hey.

Quote from: plolp on May 11, 2016, 10:17:45 AM
It is not really good news ....
Whatever the order of spins,
this theorem is true.
So it's always random .

Has it been established that there are limits to the random, hey hey?

Roulettes still makin cats go insane, amazing, hey hey.

Quote from: Garnabby on May 03, 2016, 10:15:53 PM
Nah.  Time moves on.  Build on it.  What's the point of building memorials to tidy up what never was?

You'll just end up another step behind on what should come next in your life.

(Still freezes up in here. Lol. Lol.)

Cheers.

Yikes, the garnabby is back, hey hey.

Quote from: Albalaha on April 14, 2016, 01:39:21 AM
It is not like that. Negative progressions can help but not in the way they have been used considering only short run. If one can prepare a negative progression considering odds of the long run, he is more likely to succeed as long run results are more likely to be closer to the mean. For example, due to the house edge, in 1000 spins, Red or black are likely to hit approx 486 times but due to the extreme run of variance against it may lead it to hit 10% lesser, i.e. (486-48)=438 times, one should still be able to win. That is the core idea.

Exactly, the deep negative progression allow you to withstand the extreme deviation from the close to 50-50 outcome. And my style allow me to win well, and regular even if I only win 16.6666666666 percents of my placed bets, hey hey.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 29, 2016, 03:59:30 PM
While 3700 spins might not be so good indicator of RTM in action for very small bets like singles or splits, it is enough to saturate Variance to an acceptable limits for bigger bets like EC, dozens, columns etc. I have simulated millions spins to see all these.

Ain't nobody gonna live long enough to buck up against millions of spins so why bother, hey hey?

Query, what's the best style to bet on one dozen only. And do you cats think  you could avoid losing 14 in a row betting just one dozen, hey hey?