With my style I could capture regular nice profit winning just 16.6666666666 percents of my placed bet, depending of course how those w/l cluster, hey hey.

Quote from: Blue_Angel on March 20, 2016, 05:48:29 PM
Even Chances, but not so even after all!:-)

Dang, if that represented dozen outcome I could have made a little cake. I have never encountered anything that bad at the baccarats, hey hey.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 20, 2016, 03:39:58 PM
This is the first one. Please go ahead.
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W

Do those w/l result represent roulettes dozen or even chance, hey hey?

The mathite always drone on about how ya can't win in the long run but they are unable or unwilling to define the "long run". If the long run is millions of shoe or decision then I ain't gonna live long enough to see it, hey hey.

Quote from: Mike on March 20, 2016, 09:04:51 AM
I simulated Seth's "Turnaround" system years ago and it was a loser. The guy makes some outrageous claims and just plain weird statements on his site,  such as the Wizard of Odds is a shill for the casinos. How can anyone who debunks gambling systems be considered a shill? A shill would be someone who PROMOTES systems, not exposes them as worthless. In other words, a shill is someone like Seth!

I tested that Seth cat's Target style and it worked well, but need a large bankroll, hey hey.

In his latest that shrewd Seth cat show how you can win regular using the deep negative progression, hey hey.
http://targetbetting.blogspot.ca/

Quote from: Big EZ on March 19, 2016, 01:22:12 PM
Can you speak about the progression and not the specific style of play

The progression/mm scheme IS his style of play as he always make the same bet, hey hey.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 19, 2016, 06:49:20 AM
Have you verified his claim? Can it pass through the worst of cases and winning at last?

I tested his style of play bucking up against what would equal about six month of dice action and it was good for about 33 units profit per hour, hey hey.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 19, 2016, 03:47:44 AM
  Can you reproduce that MM for evaluation here? If it is set to win, a bet of 1000 or a bankroll of 20k units is OK for me. Let us see that.

Sorry, I promised the old Armenian cat that I wouldn't divulge the beans and reveal the specific of his play. So, I can only speak generally, hey hey.

I've always thought that you could run a progression deep enough to allow you to withstand most any negative outcome. There's an Armenian cat on a member only dice forum that has come up with what seem to be an unbreakable style of play. But, there are practical consideration in that for his style ya need a 10 000 units lifetimes bankroll and ya need to have access to tables offering the fat spread so you can make a max bet of slightly more than 800 unit. I said it again and I'll say it before, in the end it boils down to havin the balls and bankroll baby, hey hey.

Comps are very dependent on location. Vegas is stingy but Reno joints are generally very generous with the comp, hey hey.

Quote from: NathanDetroit on January 26, 2016, 09:13:14 PM
*****You ever figure out how the Spike manage to win 72 percents of his placed bet at the roulettes even chance wager, hey hey?*****

Quote by  soxfan.



72 percent ! Pure genius Dr. Watson.

The spike was a serious cat, hey hey!

You ever figure out how the Spike manage to win 72 percents of his placed bet at the roulettes even chance wager, hey hey?

Quote from: Gizmotron on January 26, 2016, 05:25:47 AM
Here is how winning consistently works.

You go on the internet and stumble over everything that doesn't work for years. You try everything you can think of. You overlook advice of others because it has nothing to do with what you are interested in now. Even though any advice has yet to cause the casinos to change tactics in the last 200 years, you keep searching. Some of you do your own research even. You keep this up hoping to discover the so called holy grail that nobody has discovered yet. Once you find it you go silent on the internet forums...

... ... ... ..........................................!

Ah, where's the GARNABBY at when ya really need him, hey hey?

You never say what style you use that cause you so much losses at the baccarats, hey hey.

Quote from: Lung Yeh on December 02, 2015, 03:18:36 AM
Point noted. I was just thinking to disclose the result of the proposed trip for discussion purposes, subject to mutual agreement. In real play, I won't have the inclination to do a commentary round by round nor would anybody worth their salt. It would be quite distracting; as if trying to win is not challenging enough. I wonder how those who can document and rationalise their bet decisions round by round do it. Hats off to them.

So from a practical standpoint, the best we can propose to do is to disclose the end results at the conclusion of the trip. We can have documentary proofs posted. Anyway, just thinking out loud.