Quote from: Jimske on April 06, 2015, 03:47:23 PM
So in this small sample the parlay on a win produced 11 more wins than losses from my count.      Question still is the same .  Can one bet placement produce significantly different run lengths (LIAR) than another.  If not then we are barking up the wrong tree.  If so then we can tailor our bets accordingly.

The LIAR is not so important for me cuz I can withstand 10L and capture my coup of back to back win for a nice profit. I still maintain that different bs style offer up different w/l cluster. Some bs style are better than other for capturing back to back wins. So it isn't a one size fit all proposition as far as matching bs style with progression/mm plan, hey hey.

At the Jimske suggestion I eyeballed a coupla few recently played shoes applying the double zz style, hey hey.

1.llwlwllwwwlwwwwlllwllwllwwlwwlwlwlwllwllwlwllwwlwwllwwlllwwwlwlwllwwwwl
2.wllllwwwllwlwwwlwlllllllwllwwllwwlwwlllwlwwlwwlwllwllwwllllwwlwwllwlllllwl
3.lwwlwwlwwwlwlllwwwwwwwlllwwwlllwlwwwlwllwwlwwwlwwllwwlwwllwwllwwwwllllwlww
4.llwwwllllwwllwwwwwwwwlllllllwllwwlllwwlwlwllllwwwlwlwwwwwlwlwwll

I agree with that Preston Bailey cat. Yeasr ago Itested double zz against craps decision P-Dp using star as written and it did seem to be efficient at capturing the back to back win, hey hey.

Wow, so the john-o/mr.tilt has mental toughness? I'm laughin so hard I got Guinness comin all out of mouth all over my damned keyboard, hey hey!

After doing some testing I come to conclusion that shrewd cats should be usin Star, as written, at the dice tables, hey hey!

Quote from: Bayes on March 09, 2015, 07:21:57 AM
I agree, it's a great book and probably the best of a bad bunch. But the progression will still fail if you don't have a good bet selection (I coded it years ago) and LGH doesn't give any advice on that apart from saying that the progression should "turn the tide using any sensible bet selection".

You're left completely in the dark as to what a "sensible" bet selection is. 

If all bs style resolve to close to 50-50 then what does it matter? I have been testing a static bet method at dice using the star system on the wincraps, and returning about 20 unit per hour, hey hey.

I post up the Holloway style as written in the book, hey hey.

Quote from: Jimske on March 07, 2015, 02:58:46 PM
I've never seen his prog.  Can you provide info or a link?

I post up the Holloway, but he gives a few different ways to play beside just the rise and fall style. In any event, EVERY serious cat should own a copy of Fulltime Gambler, hey hey.

1-1-1-1-1-2-2-2-2-3-3-3-4-4-5-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-14-16-18-20-22-25-28-30-32-35-40-45-50-55-60-70-80-90-100-110-120-135-150

Roulettes ain't my scene but Fulltime Gambler is the best book out there. And, if you have the balls and bankroll, I think that Holloways progression is one of the best, hey hey.

That was interesting. I don't play poker anymore but my nephew has been making about 26-30 per hour playing sng tournament online.

So what's the best bs style for the dozens if a cat just wants to avoid gettin clipped for 18 losses in a row?

Have any of you roulettes playin cats ever seen on of the dozen "sleep" for 18 or more spins?