Quote from: Bally6354 on January 24, 2013, 09:02:13 AM


My experience on the live casino front is that they will take countermeasures once you start getting ahead and it looks like you are a hard nut to crack.

cheers

What kind of countwrmeasures, what do they do. What can they do.

I would never play Paddy, they
only give you 20 seconds between spins. that's barely
enough time to write down the results, let alone
study them and make a decision for the next bet.

The only people I see on the net unhappy with Bet365
have tried to withdraw large amounts of money, in
the thousands, and have run afoul of the verifying who
they are process. One guy withdrew $5000 and his
own bank turned down the payment from 365 saying
there was something amiss in his account. So of course
365 closed the guys account and investigated. Story
after story like that, rarely do you see they just flat
out refuse to pay for no reason.

What the min bet on EC's on the live wheels? What is it
at Paddy?

So how does this apply to bet365?

I'm only concerned with the live roulette wheels. Are
they honest?

Is Bet365 honest and do they pay if you win?

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 23, 2013, 08:28:03 PM
So mr how does someone win a unit before finding the next table?

You say to win a game takes an average of 62 spins. I
just don't see how switching tables after 62 spins is
hit and run.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 23, 2013, 05:56:48 AM
At the conclusion of a game, I log out.

That isn't hit and run. HAR is when you win a unit and find
another table. Playing till the game is over is called 'playing'.

I'm not understanding how hit and run
works with a system that requires so
much tracking. Could you explain how
HAR works on this, I don't get it.

I'm done with this thread. Fender/Legend is proving
his ignorance with every post, let him continue alone.
Let him hold his breath till July 2018 if if likes. Who
cares.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 18, 2013, 09:05:03 PM
No comparison. You have to play to see what unfolds.

Absolutely not true. I can read a systems description
and if I don't see a clearly manifested edge, I know it's a
loser. For the 100th time, you MUST have the edge
to win consistently in the long term. You always mistake
short term results as meaning something.

You're so hung up on tricking the math and random
that you can't see the forest for the tree's.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 18, 2013, 08:51:27 PM

Until you actually play a method Spike. you will never know this.

Yeah, right. You don't have to actually eat dog stuff
to know it tastes awful, you know.

Quote from: Bayes on January 18, 2013, 08:31:55 PM

That's right. I wanted to test the program first so ran it on one dozen. Since the code for the other dozens is exactly the same, if you know the result for one dozen then you know it for all of them.

Fender doesn't understand stuff like this. He see's the
layout and the first dozen can't be identical to the other
two. If you were testing EC's and only tested H/L because
the results for R/B and O/E would be identical to H/L, Fender
would have a fit. That can't be right in the world he lives in.

Quote from: Bayes on January 18, 2013, 08:09:20 PM
Gizmo, JL didn't ask me to code it,

The problem with a system like this is, it's a real brick
wall monster. Just lose the progression once and
you're screwed. You hit the brick wall. But you don't
know when it will happen, you just know that it will.

And with roulette, its always sooner rather than later..

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 18, 2013, 01:48:17 PM

The only way ill ever get H.A.R superiority stamped in reality

The only way that'll happen is if the nature of random
changes. Fat chance.