The furthest what? The last what? I don't understand.

Quote from: ll l lll ll l lll on March 17, 2013, 03:28:30 AM
i know that a correction is right around the corner. 

Or not. You must spend a lot of time waiting
in a real casino, because 'corrections' in whatever
form certainly don't obey a timetable. You're
doing what many players do, you've identified
a sequence of events that you have a small edge
on and you patiently await those events to manifest.
Much like Gizmo's method on dozens or his Global
Whatchamacallit. This can go very fast playing actuals
on a computer, and take many hours in a real casino
betting real money, even playing more than one table.

Sure, just draw up a 15 step Labby, works every time.

Quote from: Bayes on March 16, 2013, 06:51:54 PM
How can you possibly know that? 

Saying "if they did, they wouldn't be a member of a forum" assumes that every member of a roulette forum has joined only because they're looking for a winning strategy and don't already have one. While that may be true for most members, you can't say that you know that it's true for ALL.

I'm on forums because it keeps me thinking about roulette
all the time. Its that simple.

Quote from: The Crow on March 15, 2013, 01:30:12 AM
Only when you have absolutely learned everything you need to know about roulette is when you are able to conquer randomness.

TC

Everything you 'need' to know? Maybe you need to know
almost nothing. And somebody else needs to know almost
everything. What you know about roulette has nothing to
do with understanding random. It exists outside of the game,
you know.

Quote from: Gizmotron on March 14, 2013, 09:09:41 PM
I think that playing on balance as an expectation is a fallacy.

It never balances and even thinking that way
when playing is a minefield.

Quote from: Razor on March 14, 2013, 08:59:40 PM
"""In fact, the farther
you take a stream of random numbers, the farther away
from balance it gets."""

I don t agree with this.

it's a fact. The farther away you get from the start,
the closer it gets percentage wise, but further apart
the actual numbers get. Its impossible for roulette to
ever balance itself. It has something to do with the
law of large numbers. Ask Bayes..

Quote from: Gizmotron on March 14, 2013, 08:32:49 PM
As you say, the best balance point is for even chance bets. It pays 1/1, you must win one out of two bets to balance.

This has to do with the layout and not random. Random
doesn't know what a balance point is. Its always seeking
to balance itself, but never achieves it. In fact, the farther
you take a stream of random numbers, the farther away
from balance it gets.

Quote from: Gizmotron on March 14, 2013, 06:52:11 PM
my money is on understanding randomness.

That's because randomness is all there is. Studying
anything else in roulette is a waste of time. Even
the math is a waste of time. You don't need math to
know how random works, it'll just slow you down and
clog up your brain. You don't need programs and
computers and bots and all the whistle and bells. You
only think you do.

In the spirit of friendship and harmony, Gizmo, could you
please explain what a balance point in roulette is. Thanks
in advance.

Quote from: Ralph on March 12, 2013, 05:40:39 AM


If it is done with so small edge as  0.5 -  2% the player will rather soon make millions.

Old time gambler saying:

"First you have to win, then you have to get the casino
to pay you."

Good luck with that and your winning millions plan..

Flat betting isn't like a religion, either you believe or
you don't. If you have the edge, of course it works,
it has to work. If you don't have the edge it will never
work. It can't.

Its really that simple, why over complicate everything.

Quote from: FLAT_IN_O on March 10, 2013, 10:34:58 PM
Last 9 splits versus further 9 splits.......staying on lasts until change
then continue on furtest.....very simple,chops versus rides

what's a further 9 split. What are 'rides'.

Quote from: FLAT_IN_O on March 10, 2013, 09:22:55 PM

And its one of the most successful way of playing
LvF 9 splits that 2CAT Sam is presently exploring
and playing,is proving it.

what's an LvF 9 split?

Quote from: The Crow on March 10, 2013, 08:23:49 PM
I am a professional gambler. I am a professional roulette player. Yes, I am an advantage player, not the best, but hard to beat.

TC

Doing this? Its what you said you played om Feb 27th:

"I don't believe in past numbers. So I take a picture of a wheel, cross out 12 numbers randomly, divide the rest of the numbers into two groups of twelve with the zero in one which makes is 13. When a numbers comes in one of the groups, I bet the other group, one unit per number. I use a progression of 1, 2, 5, 7, 9 - stop loss. Crazy, but it works for me."

I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt this does not
work long term, certainly it wouldn't work for a pro roulette
player. There's no bet selection here, its just random against
random with a progression.