7 on 1 vs Dublinbet Table 1 2400 spins

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 13, 2013, 11:56:24 AM
...I only published it to show one of my chief methods.

And 'good on ya' for doing so, good or bad, that is for people to make their own mind up.

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 13, 2013, 11:22:46 AM
No TC that was step 2 of the 5 step progression. I've never had to go to the 5th step yet in 930 games.

Of course...  got it.

ok, so I'm correct, by the time you won, you were on progressin step 5... 

So, if I am correct you won the second bet on progression step 5, correct..?

Why are we interested if it became a 7 GAP or not..?? 

John, something I don't get, is you state: I now commence betting against there being seven of these 4 gaps in a row

However, the last bet that won the game (the second bet) did not commence betting after three gaps from a dozen one number, see below:

09----DOUBLE 4 GAP TRIGGER OF DOZEN 1
05
18
12
14
15
18
07----BET 1 STEP 1 LOST
07
20
32
06 - Dozen 1 - second trigger..?
14 - count one
21 - count two
29 - count three
29 - Why did you not bet here..??
28
26
06----WIN BET 2 STEP 2 AS DOZEN 1 BECAME A 7 GAP.

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 08:47:33 AM
I request Bayes, Gizmo, Spike or any other sensible person to test this method and bring forth its reality.

Can you not manage that yourself..? 

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 08:34:09 AM
He has provided his "out of world" stuff already. Would you like to try this?

Then just let him do that..? You don't have to try it and neither do I...!

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 04:54:57 AM
... but you may lead many to commit suicide, believing you.

Really..!?! Are we all that gullible here..?? Whilst this may be a Harebrain idea with an Insane Progression, surely people are not stupid enough to try it if they don't want to lose it..??

Why not just let John carry on proving his systems in peace..?

John, I thought the zero was ignored..?

I believe so Bayes, that got me before... logically you would expect a 'gap' to be not inclusive...?

Superman, how could you mention that, it never loses..! 

John, could you throw us say a hundred spins or so, with bet triggers / bet amounts marked beside them..?

Quote from: JohnLegend on January 10, 2013, 05:39:20 AM
Yes Superman, but its only being played live. It works better live. H.A.R and live. Its very strong. If I go 2,000/1 it would be no surprise.

John, perhaps now is a good time for 7 on 1 to be introduced afresh to this forum..?? (with hard-n-fast codeable rules)

Here's a set of 4000 consecutive spins that I recorded last year at 'Dublinbet Table 1' ~ all helps with testing...