Does this book have any value ?

Flat bet for how long?

Can't speak German what's the stratagie?

H is a 20 # bet and n is 16# bet .and is normal for the 20 to have more hit but the payout will always be the problem the accuracy of prediction is not there.

Quote from: Gizmotron on June 16, 2014, 03:37:19 PM
Bet the pattern.

Ok here how would you bet this?


Hhn nhh hhn nhh nnh hhn hnn hnh hnh nhh hhn hhn nhn nhn hhn hhh hnn nnn  hnh hhh hnn hnn

Bet selection is what exactly to elegant paterns?

Show me what it would like please.

Quote from: Dr. Mabuse on June 15, 2014, 04:10:52 PM
This  is a legit question.

Would any one  please  explain to the infidels the DIFFERENCE  between a pattern and an elegant pattern.

I trust this question meets the political correctness requirements  of this  board.

i would like to know too

Quote from: Gizmotron on June 13, 2014, 10:11:33 PM
I know exactly when. The first loss is a signal that the pattern has broken down. That's the perfect time to stop feeding the table. Like I have said before, context matters to me a great deal. I play imperfect repetitions of patterns. I may come right back after a first loss IF THE CONTEXT FOR THE CONTINUING STILL HOLDS TRUE. That just means that the first loss is not always the last bet. But most of the time it is. If you use selective methods you can search for other opportunities. Nobody forces you to keep placing bets.

The pattern breaks down and you stop, just to re-start and stop again and therefore your bombarded by more chopping, roulette is the hardest to make money with patterns.

Quote from: Gizmotron on June 13, 2014, 04:45:05 PM
So how would your method avoid the losing streaks?  My method allows me to stay out of losing streaks.

You don't know when the losing streak will start or end.

Quote from: Gizmotron on February 26, 2013, 05:27:33 AM
I'm accustomed to looking how the singles are flowing. There is one pure thing going on. When it changes from red or from black, there is at least one repeat from the new color. When it changes to a stretch of singles it comes back to the same characteristic. Once again it starts with at least one repeat before shifting.

I would bet big for every next bet after a change. Then I would bet at 25% of each big bet until it loses. The loss being a shift to the next color. After two losses in a row I would see that the perfect condition had changed. So that ends exploiting it. BUT -- it comes back to doing it again. That's one of the characteristics of the global effect. The strange configurations become a kind of type that returns for 30 minutes to several hours. Before me , I doubt that there were any players that tried to exploit these kind of big picture characteristics and conditions.

Once you start seeing these conditions you will never be able to go back to not seeing them ever again. They are great opportunities waiting to be exploited.
I'm so sure ths discussion will be fruitful that

And what happens when it chops s for 20 in a row?

Quote from: Bally6354 on January 28, 2014, 09:38:28 AM
Hello Warrior

The 2nd's refers to a second consecutive hit of an E.C. and the 3rd's refers to a third consecutive hit of an E.C.
Any hit of the same E.C. after the 3rd's does not count in the example I posted.

So taking those Black numbers again.....

33 is the first number and it's black. So now I am waiting to see if Black makes a second appearance on the next spin. If it does, I put a W (win) in the 2nd's column. If it doesn't come out on the next spin, I put a L (loss) in the 2nd's column.

The next number out was 26 Black. So it gets a W in the 2nd's column.

Now I am waiting to see what the next number is. If it's Black, that's a third consecutive hit and I will put a W (win) in the 3rd's column. If it's not Black, I will put a L (loss) in the 3rd's column.

The next number out was 26 Black. So it gets a W in the 3rd's column.

Now it doesn't matter if there are another 3 consecutive Black numbers. They don't get recorded. Because I am not looking for 4th's, 5th's or 6th's.

I repeat the same process for all 3 E.C's...but nothing stopping anybody just playing 1 or 2.

My example came from the first batch of numbers that I found and I suppose in hindsight doesn't really show the benefits of tracking in this way. So here is another example of 2nd's and 3rd's which should give a clearer picture. Let's assume I am tracking Black in this example and the first column is the 2nd's and the second column is the 3rd's.

1) L
2) W  L
3) W  W
4) L
5) L
6) W  L
7) W  L
8} W  W
9) W  W
10) L
11) W  W
12) L
13) L
14) W  W
15) L
16) L
17) W  W
18} L
19) L
20) W  W
21) L
22) L
23) W  W

So looking at 8} to 23) you can see that there was 7 wins and 9 losses for the 2nd's. However there was a straight 7 wins for the 3rd's. This is really the whole point behind the operation. You are using different streams (ie....2nd's + 3rd's) to look for the strongest trends to follow.

I hope that helps. 

perfect I understand  thnx

Quote from: Bally6354 on January 27, 2014, 10:16:06 PM
Hello 

I would like to share the idea of 2nd's + 3rd's here.

There is an Excel sheet at the bottom with an example using Black/Red and Low/High.

I will use the Black numbers in the sheet to give an example....

What I am tracking for is to see if a Black number goes to 2 hits and then goes on to 3 hits.

33
26
26
31
33
8

There are 6 consecutive black numbers there and so I put a W for both the 2nd's and the 3rd's.

The next black numbers....

29
13

Now there are only 2 black numbers there. So I put a W in the 2nd's and an L in the 3rd's.

Next up...

8

Only 1 black number there. So an L goes in the 2nd's and I can't put anything in the 3rd's.

Next up...

29
24

2 black numbers. So a W in the 2nd's and an L in the 3rd's.

What I am playing close attention at is the W's and L's in the 2nd's + 3rd's.

It's possible to get a run of L's in the 2nd's.....BUT.....a run of W's in the 3rd's. This would happen if you got runs of just either 1 black and runs of 3+ blacks.

Charting all three E.C's (Black/Red, Low/High, Odd/Even) is the way to go.

A tracker would do the job OR you could just skip a spin or two in a B+M casino to give you time to track everything.

Of course....you could track 2nd's, 3rd's + 4th's and even use this idea for dozens and columns.

It is just another way to look for betting the W's OR L's depending on what's happening in the 2nd's and 3rd's.

cheers.

I really don't get what your doing how do you mean 2 nd 3 rds?

You guys are worse then women you sound like ckickens clucking ,moderator why let this stupid debate go on. He said she said what the f.

Nice graph I did you manage that?