﻿ A few remarkable shoes from last night

Topic: A few remarkable shoes from last night  (Read 750 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Johno-Egalite

• Moderator
• Posts: 190
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2019, 07:03:53 pm »
• Anybody fancy a spot of DBL?

My word, Keith and the crew at BTC would make a killing waffling about these shoes, AFTER THE EVENT.

They are interesting though..

Maths is great like that.  Once it's been proven that no method exists to do what you claim, it's not necessary to go through the details of your system to prove that it doesn't work.  You claim that it does something which can be proven impossible, therefore your claim is false. The details don't matter.

Johno-Egalite

• Moderator
• Posts: 190
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #16 on: May 10, 2019, 10:56:06 am »
• Couple shoes of note, both containing 15 streaks

Maths is great like that.  Once it's been proven that no method exists to do what you claim, it's not necessary to go through the details of your system to prove that it doesn't work.  You claim that it does something which can be proven impossible, therefore your claim is false. The details don't matter.

Johno-Egalite

• Moderator
• Posts: 190
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2019, 06:08:56 pm »
• Banker Heaven, which was ahead by 3-1 at one stage.

next shoe (different deck of cards)

TIE Heaven, I made a nice chunk of change off a lot of these TIES, as I insured a lot of my larger bets, each paying 9-1

I'm betting Player, insure via the Tie, Tie hits, repeat the bet, Tie hits again, drop my bet, Player wins :-)

Maths is great like that.  Once it's been proven that no method exists to do what you claim, it's not necessary to go through the details of your system to prove that it doesn't work.  You claim that it does something which can be proven impossible, therefore your claim is false. The details don't matter.

Johno-Egalite

• Moderator
• Posts: 190
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #18 on: May 17, 2019, 09:29:57 am »
• Do tell, how often is the expectation of a streak of 6?

I would find this shoe extremely difficult to Trend which why in the main, I tend to steer clear of doing so.

Maths is great like that.  Once it's been proven that no method exists to do what you claim, it's not necessary to go through the details of your system to prove that it doesn't work.  You claim that it does something which can be proven impossible, therefore your claim is false. The details don't matter.

Bally6354

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1127
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #19 on: May 17, 2019, 10:32:39 pm »
• Thanks for posting up all these shoes Lugi. They are useful for testing purposes coming from a real shoe and not just some RNG output.

Regarding the last one, again, easy in hindsight but interesting all the same how the BBPP only appeared once and then it chopped the next six times from BBP to B. It's useful info if you are using a framework to look for what's not appearing in the grand scheme of the entire shoe. Plenty of chop action in those last sixteen hands as well with only the odd single repeat (3). So the second half of the shoe changed from the first half which was predominantly FTL.  Hands 15 - 33 had 14 B's interspersed by 5 single P's as well.

That was my reading of it and I would have navigated my way through it. In all honesty, I am starting to think that there aren't actually bad shoes per se. It's the player factors that will affect how we react and if we can maintain composure.

New scientific evidence has come to light that one pint of beer takes nine minutes off your life.
According to my calculations, I died sometime in September 1845.

Johno-Egalite

• Moderator
• Posts: 190
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #20 on: May 18, 2019, 05:55:32 pm »
• Hi Bally

I suspect you know which online casino I'm playing at.

The more you play, you start beginning to get a 6th sense for the shoes.  Monster streaks you don't see in B&M casinos occur frequently.  Shoes that start with long streaks of 6 ~ 8, you can guarantee the bet selection OLD will be worth a try towards the end.  Shoes that produce long chops of 7 or 10, nothing over 2 for the first 20 hands, then FLD is the way to go once an hits 3. I'm still surprised at the number of back to mirrored streak lengths,  Exact 3 by 3, surrounded both sides by chops, , exact 4 by 4, 5 by 5.  Nothing like the chaotic mess you see in casinos, it's like endless symmetry (or maybe I'm just tired and see what I want to see) LOL

I've also found 3 tables which give the player a bit more time, 15 seconds, which helps a bit when under pressure trying to figure out how much to bet next or been playing for over 12 hours.
Maths is great like that.  Once it's been proven that no method exists to do what you claim, it's not necessary to go through the details of your system to prove that it doesn't work.  You claim that it does something which can be proven impossible, therefore your claim is false. The details don't matter.

Bally6354

• Hero Member
• Posts: 1127
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #21 on: May 19, 2019, 11:24:06 am »
• Lugi, the only ones that I knew about up until recently were the 2 main platforms that most of the well known Online Casinos use here in the UK. I did find an Asian one that gives you roughly 25-30 seconds to bet. The only thing with that one is that the site is mainly dedicated to the financial markets and you have to play in some form of cryptocurrency. It all looks legitimate but I have not tried it yet. There looks to be a few more of them as well from Malaysia and Singapore. You can find them by just typing in Baccarat Online on YouTube. 11 seconds is too quick for me and so I don't use them. Anything around or over 20 seconds would be fine.

I genuinely prefer Baccarat over Roulette nowadays. Quite often the second half of the shoe or backend of a shoe does throw up different results to the first portion. I said that I thought timing was the most important aspect to the way that I play but I should have added anticipation as well. It's a combination of timing/anticipation so you don't get there too late when something that's happening is just about to finish. So I suppose the question then is does the second half / backend of a shoe produce different characteristics a lot of the time because of the cards that have already appeared. Roulette is different in a sense in the fact that it's just a continuous stream of random numbers. I never really noticed it in Roulette but then I wasn't a fan back then of the EC. I know others like Bayes were keen on some type of regression to the mean so it could be just a natural occurrence in all types of EC situations although I know a lot of others have just dismissed it as more gamblers fallacy nonsense. Bottom line as far as I am concerned is that you can only play what you can see and the more information you have at your disposal, then all the better.

cheers
New scientific evidence has come to light that one pint of beer takes nine minutes off your life.
According to my calculations, I died sometime in September 1845.

Johno-Egalite

• Moderator
• Posts: 190
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #22 on: May 19, 2019, 12:38:10 pm »
• I've often considered, that if a shoe starts overtly streaky due to lots of naturals, you see lots of 8's and 9's leaving the deck, it leaves small cards for the end of the shoe, which should be good for the Player side.

I checked out Gentings online Baccarat offering, sad, 1 single table, no customers, whereas the other major chain has about 18 tables which you can jump around, you can even play 4 tables at once, with customers all around the world.

Anyway shoes from last night.

Given the number of shoes I've played at this joint, the return of this series of chops was surprising, threw me a little as I had switched to FLD mode.

Streak City!

This is kinda amazing to my eyes, look at the perfect 20 hand symmetry after the first single Bank, which is only broken by the first double Bank.  I was watching that unfold, thinking I must bet the Bank to double, which it did, but I missed the bet BUGGER.  I would have expected a long series of chops in this shoe, but they never materialised,  than when it thins out a little for about 7 hands.

Amazing in hindsight, again a perfect 23 hand symmetrical pattern with it's middle being the Player streak of 3, broken by the proceeding Player 5 streak.  Early switching between OLD & FLD brings in a lot of juice from this shoe, isn't hindsight a wonderful thing.

Finally, oh deary deary me, saved this one for the last.  I love shoes that start with long streaks as it presents lots of "bet against the continuation of the Pairs (anti-repeating triplets) options.  Oh Boy, I was playing "AB" and to make matters worst, upon seeing the Banker streak at the start, I decided to up the ante for some quick profitable hits  Double whammy.

I'll be truthful, best readers don't think everything is a walk in the park and gambling is so easy.  It inflicted a lot of damage, a world of pain.

How to recover from that? Your mind starts attacking you, "if only, I pushed it to far, I could have been, why".

So switched to strictly "AB" at a higher chip level using a Fibonacci, jaysus, a few times I had to place 34 unit bets, which thankfully all won.  So I'm recouping, but all it takes is one bad run, and it's bust.  Yet I knew "AB" is specifically designed to control the LAIRS, so leave all the small feeler bets, I should't lose 8LIAR.

But it was diffcult obtaining the 2nd win or WLW on occasions.  Maintained that for many shoes, and to borrow an old quote from GamblerGlen "it's like playing with wet dynamite".

I got so far, nerves rattled, I abandoned "AB" and decided to grind to a certain point, scaling back by my unit value and using an even deeper Fibonacci.  The lower the unit value the further I could stretch things, all the way up to a 233 unit bet if required. The bet selection I decidced to employ was basic FLD. Exactly the same as I used back in 2004.

Except this time, I would look for tables already showing approx 6 chops, so basically applying VL's.  For me to lose, any given shoe would have to produce a series of something like 16 chops. I didn't expect on seeing that last night.  So I'm grinding away, then was struggling to stay awake, so had to quit.  Still a fair bit of work to do.

I'm into the hundreds and hundreds of shoes using this "AB" approach,  for sure you get rough shoes, but in the main, it has served me well and overall held up. but with Gambling nothing is cast iron, you encounter shoes such as above to test your fortitude. Anything and everything can lose on it's day.

And it's too easy to say the event OLD would have cleaned up, while conveniently forgetting those occasions when Trending has simply not worked.

Enjoy, or not, in this case.

Might pin this to my wall, as reminder.

Maths is great like that.  Once it's been proven that no method exists to do what you claim, it's not necessary to go through the details of your system to prove that it doesn't work.  You claim that it does something which can be proven impossible, therefore your claim is false. The details don't matter.

Johno-Egalite

• Moderator
• Posts: 190
Re: A few remarkable shoes from last night
« Reply #23 on: May 19, 2019, 02:49:07 pm »
• Amazing, it's like Karma.

Bad mind games, if you let it get to you.

Mention something and it's destine to happen..

No, I didn't walk into any of those shoes, I avoid them all,  LOL

Hoping around tables sniffing out what looks good for FLD, jump on, shoe changes to OLD.  Exactly why I detest Trending, it is mind zapping it really screws you.  Never felt so frustrated, up and down the Fibo ladder.

Got there, have to repeat this fate two more times and it's all good, but now time for a break from this trending Malarkey.

Maths is great like that.  Once it's been proven that no method exists to do what you claim, it's not necessary to go through the details of your system to prove that it doesn't work.  You claim that it does something which can be proven impossible, therefore your claim is false. The details don't matter.