"I live to succeed, not to please you or anyone else."

"I don't stop when I'm tired. I only stop when I'm done."

By:  Marilyn Monroe

I don't know whose quote it is, but I like it
"Life is like a hand of poker. You never know what you're gonna get"

"He who is not courageous enough to take risks will accomplish nothing in life".

Muhammad Ali

Gotta love those past days, when casinos valued their regular players.

Lovepreaks, your fine.  We understand your English.  Please ask.  Many do not post here any longer because they created and lived on drama.  I will not have that.

Our read rate is very high.  The posting rate is not because of all the bad mouth and drama created on other forums about us. 

Your questions are fine.  Thanks for your interest. 

Alrelax
Forum Administrator & Owner
Baccarat Player in B&M

I understand you're relying on an AI translator and learning from its sometimes inaccurate outputs. I also realize you perceive yourself as a slower learner, which must be frustrating. Please excuse any awkward phrasing, as English isn't my first language. Given my focus on prioritizing asymmetrical betting situations based on patterns, how can I best predict betting positions? What's the most effective way to study and pinpoint betting timings within these patterns? Could you illustrate with an example? Specifically, if the sequence is B → P → B → P → P → B → B → B → P, what would be a reasonable prediction for the next bet after the last three hands, B B P B NEXT ->B B P? P B B?

I realize that asking such direct questions could be perceived as impolite by someone of your caliber. Please accept my apologies. However, as a non-native English speaker, I find it quite difficult to keep up with the nuanced discussions in this community. Nonetheless, I'm resolved to no longer be disadvantaged, which is why I'm writing this. Even if I lose money, I want to understand the rationale behind my bets. Or, to put it more bluntly, I simply don't want to lose

We're deadly sure that the asymmetry/symmetry issue is the main tool to extract an advantage from.
Simplyfing:

S-S = stop the betting

S= what to bet next depends about the previous As/S texture

As-S= bet As

S-As= bet As

As= almost always bet As

As-As= caution, sky's the limit but what we have secured should remain in our pockets.

So any hand dealt is a new hand my a$$, cards are arranged to make more probable asymmetrical situations than symmetrical ones.
Situations seemingly belonging to a kind of steady symmetrical world are just springing from incidents, natural variance or weird unlikely card distributions.

Now a careful multilayered progressive plan cannot be wrong as:

First level of confidence:

As-As > As-S

S-As > S-S

Second level of confidence:

Any S-S happened previously somewhat reduces the S-As propensity at a new pattern.

Any As-As and S-As events happened previously endorse the As-As and S-As propensity at a new pattern.

Third level of confidence:

- As-As coming out clustered twice previously is not a good indicator to bet again towards another As-As pattern;

- S-S coming out clustered twice is a good indicator that the next S will be followed by As and not S.

- S-As coming out clustered twice is an excellent indicator that next pattern will be of the same shape (that is that S will come out as isolated again).

To provide a vulgar example say the shoe went as:

BB
PP
BBBBBB
PPPPP
B
P
BB

Such fragment will form a S-S-S sequence (BBPP, BBB../PPP.., BP).
Run the derived roads and such symmetry will go down the toilet.
In fact only the sr will form one symmetrical pattern. Everything else will produce asymmetrical patterns either at sr and at the remaining roads.

as.

As long as cards are asymmetrically distributed along any shoe dealt (100% of the times),

As clusters > S clusters and As isolated events < S isolated events.

Unlikely distributions, incidents and natural variance will make the overalternating mood as the least probable happening so possibly inverting the above propositions.

Therefore sometimes S clusters will predominate over As clusters; at a lesser degree S isolated events will be more restricted in their appearance than average so privileging S clusters.
That further denies the overalternating mood appearance.

When in doubt go either for low/moderate levels of asymmetry better by trying to by pass the lowest losing levels or tell the casino to wait for inferior players action by not betting a fkng nothing.

If properly executed and by choosing the right random walks,  this plan is equal or superior than the edge sorting technique.

as.

Good topic and discussion lovepreaks. I look forward to your further discussion with AsymBacGuy.




Continued Success,