I am playing a system playing 11 numbers for 3 spins flat betting 1 1 1, after testing 360 spins ( not much) i won 86 and lost 30, here
a win means winning 1 of 3 spins and loss equals no hit for 3 spins, So what would be the best progression according to this strike rate?
Thanks..
Unfortunately progressions rise exponentially, so you could be looking at the jaw dropping;
[attachimg=1]
I will share my own experience regarding roulette. Back in 2004 I designed my own system which covered 28 numbers, I flat betted using $25 chips ($350 per spin) and won $10000 in two nights thanks to a novice trainee croupier. It's and my downfall was the introduction of a negative progression, which came later in the piece. The lesson is, if you can avoid increasing your bets, then this should always be your aim.
If this kind of strike rate prevails then i would always be in profit flat betting don't u think??
Testing 360 spins is totally insufficient to form any valid, reliable conclusion
on any system. Imo the best is to have a wide spread test of the system to determine
whether it is any good.
I agree with rolex Watch, best is to avoid progression unless there is conclusive evidence
that the hit rate is exceptionally good.
Ant seasoned player will take one glance at a " system" and can tell if is playable or not. He does not waste his time with testing.
Here is an excellent site where you can calculate and test your own progressions:
http://www.loothog.com/ (http://www.loothog.com/)
It's the first tool right at the top...
Thank You All...
ROLEX WATCH....think u need to check profits on that chart its completely way off what it should be...its an 11 number bet....[smiley]aes/coffee.png[/smiley]...
Yeah, then after realizing the system is not playable, he's dead broke in a few minutes .....lol lol