+ Register

[Mohitomish]

I am playing a system playing 11 numbers for 3 spins  flat betting 1 1 1, after testing 360 spins ( not much) i won  86 and lost 30, here
a win means winning 1 of 3 spins and loss equals no hit for 3 spins, So what would be the best progression according to this strike rate?




Thanks..

[Rolex-Watch]

Unfortunately progressions rise exponentially, so you could be looking at the jaw dropping;

[attachimg=1]

I will share my own experience regarding roulette.  Back in 2004 I designed my own system which covered 28 numbers, I flat betted using $25 chips ($350 per spin) and won $10000 in two nights thanks to a novice trainee croupier.  It's and my downfall was the introduction of a negative progression, which came later in the piece.  The lesson is, if you can avoid increasing your bets, then this should always be your aim.     

[Mohitomish]

If this kind of strike rate prevails then i would always be in profit flat betting don't u think??

[Rouletta]

Testing 360 spins is totally insufficient to form any valid, reliable conclusion
on any system. Imo the best is to have a wide spread test of the system to determine
whether it is any good.

I agree with rolex Watch, best is to avoid progression unless there is conclusive evidence
that the hit rate is exceptionally good.

[Dr. Mabuse]

Ant seasoned  player  will take  one glance at  a " system" and can tell   if is playable or not. He does not waste his time with testing.

[esoito]

Here is an excellent site where you can calculate and test your own progressions:

http://www.loothog.com/

It's the first tool right at the top...

[Mohitomish]

Thank You All...

[6th-sense]

ROLEX WATCH....think u need to check profits on that chart its completely way off what it should be...its an 11 number bet....[smiley]aes/coffee.png[/smiley]...

[Rouletta]

Yeah, then after realizing the system is not playable, he's dead broke in a few minutes .....lol lol