+ Register

[soxfan]

Could some of you cats pony up the l/w cluster that this vdw style produce, hey hey.

[Falkor2k15]

I think VdW can win on R/B, but something else is needed to really understand it's potential.



I thought very hard about this for many months, but in the end I wasn't able to guess the answer by chance.. it was only after several tests and coaching from one of Priyanka's best students that I finally stumbled across the secret. However, the answer is here in Priyanka's quotes from RouletteForum.cc. If you do get to discover it then you will be shocked. Nothing is really random!

IMO as the outcomes are always 50/50, that 1 spin you skip that leads to a loss might as well lead to a win. You don´t know if you´re losing pears or apples until they have just hit.

what is the significance of this statement?
You have made a beautiful point there psimoes. You will never know if you are losing pears or apples until they have just hit. If and if only there is a way. But here i would like to remind that Vdw is a versatile theory. It can be used in a number of ways. The simplified statement is if you are having two colours, then there is no way of colouring from 1 to 9 without creating an arithmetic progression of the same colour. As many have pointed out, it doesn't increase the probability of the next spin to be a certain colour. So there is no usability there.

However, can we use it beyond colours? Yes. Let us explore some possibilities to understand how versatile this is without considering the usability of this theorem.

Example 1
Consider the spins 15, 21, 23, 26, 15, 25, 33, 16, 28, 23, 14. Translating this to colours it will read B, R, R, B, B, R, B, R, B, R, R. Now let's read the outcome as whether the colour was same as previous colour (S) or different from previous colour (D). The above sequence will read D, S, D, S, D, D, D, D, D, S. We know that within 9 of these events there will be at least one arithmetic formation with D or with S.

Example 2
Same set of spins. Consider the outcomes as whether current dozen is different(D) or equal (S) to the previous dozen. The sequence will read S, S, D, D, D, S, D, D, D, S. We know that within 9 of these events there will be at least one arithmetic formation with D or with S.

Example 3
Same set of spins. Consider the outcomes as where the dozens could be expressed in a clock with a clockwise movement taking us from dozen 1 -> dozen2 -> dozen 3-> dozen 1. The relation between two dozens could be expressed as either Clockwise(CW) or Counter clock wise(CCW), denoting the shortest distance to reach the next dozen. If both dozens are same then it is considered CW. The sequence for the same set of spins will now read – CW, CW, CW, CCW, CW, CW, CCW, CW, CCW, CW.   We know that within 9 of these events there will be at least one arithmetic formation with CW or with CCW.

I know there will be lots of questions around so what? What is the applicability in roulette. Sorry, I don't have an answer. It is yet to be seen, but I have an inkling that this versatility could be put to use somehow when we are having two variables that do not essentially have a 50-50 probability appearing, but could or might give an advantage when lining up in a VdW sequence.
http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17014.75 (read a bit more about it here)

[Blue_Angel]

We know that within 9 of these events there will be at least one arithmetic formation with D or with S.

How absurd!

Then why don't you bet a Marty of 9 doubling ups??
You would always get a winner!

The fact that so many people are looking in such ways says a lot for their level of knowledge,experience and intelligence!

[3Nine]

You need to move on. VdW has nothing to do with gaining an edge.  Priyanka basically told you that months ago, didn't she?  Now, where will you look?

[Falkor2k15]

Yeah, it's not about gaining edge per se... I wish I could give a clue - not that I'm under oath or anything... what's an important thing in video editing? OH NO, I've given away too much... 

[3Nine]

Ok, you're still not seeing it.

VdW is not needed - at all. 

[Falkor2k15]

Just the defining element?

[Falkor2k15]

Ok, you're still not seeing it.

VdW is not needed - at all.

I'm seeing it mate... is it a red, is it a black? No - its super VdW man!

[TheLaw]

Looks like a few members haven't met Falkor yet...........

[Jake]

Then why don't you bet a Marty of 9 doubling ups??
You would always get a winner!

That's right. So the vdw is no better than guessing. This priyanka character is leading you all on a merry dance, and probably splitting his sides laughing about it.

[3Nine]

That's right. So the vdw is no better than guessing. This priyanka character is leading you all on a merry dance, and probably splitting his sides laughing about it.

You're wrong.

[Jake]

Prove it.

[plolp]

 Here's a gift for the lovers .

Nothing is worth the vdw gold réciproc !!!

www.dentsply.fr/fr/nos-solutions/product/vdw-gold-reciproc

[Falkor2k15]

Prove it.

VdW came by way of PhD maths genius Priyanka (presumably via her Senseis from Argentina: Manrique who died in 2008 and his master Nono Santelli who died prior to 2004), and this Non-Random concept was introduced to us in September 2015 over at RouletteForum.cc. Priyanka is also under oath: probably a member of the Freemasons or Jesuits. Here was Priyanka's position on the multiplayer roulette leader board when she was active there:


With VdW she designed this game lose 300 very quickly - but using small unit chips and placing double dozen bets where it's harder to throw away your money:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4KgiscwgRU

Same/Diff.	Defined by	Cycle	Number	Dozen	Win/Lose	Comments
			15	2
			32	3
	2	232	21	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			7	1	W	Bet the last 2 dozens
d	1	211	10	1	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	11	11	1	L
			16	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
			29	3	L
s	1	1231	3	1
			23	2
d	2	122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	2	22	20	2	L
			4	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
			32	3	L
d	3	2133	32	3
			7	1
			14	2
d	2	3122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			36	3	W
			9	1
s	2	2312	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			4	1	W
d	1	211	12	1		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
			19	2	W
d	2	122	24	2		End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	2	22	14	2	L
s	2	22	23	2
			7	1
s	2	212	22	2
s	2	22	21	2
s	2	22	16	2
			28	3
s	2	232	21	2
			6	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
			32	3	L
d	1	2131	2	1
			26	3
			23	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
s	1	1321	3	1	L
			22	2
			36	3		Bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	1231	1	1	W	End of Cycle. Bet the last 2 dozens
s	1	11	6	1	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	1	11	6	1	L
			28	3
			15	2
d	3	1323	35	3
s	3	33	34	3
			13	2
s	3	323	36	3
			19	2		Bet the last 2 dozens
s	3	323	29	3	W	End of Cycle: bet the other 2 dozens
s	3	33	35	3	L
			1	1		Bet the last 2 dozens
				2	L	FINISHED

With VdW this game was designed to win:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNWygC4ApEY

[TheLaw]

VdW came by way of PhD maths genius Priyanka (presumably via her Senseis from Argentina: Manrique who died in 2008 and his master Nono Santelli who died prior to 2004), and this Non-Random concept was introduced to us in September 2015 over at RouletteForum.cc. Priyanka is also under oath: probably a member of the Freemasons or Jesuits. Here was Priyanka's position on the multiplayer roulette leader board when she was active there:

Yes. Priyanka has a high-score on a fantasy roulette site created by the owner of several Roulette boards (including this one) who admitted openly that the software is flawed.

Would be nice if Falkor actually read the fine print...........unfortunately, he just wants the labor pains......not the baby.