+ Register

[plolp]

Winrate ; 3,16

not so impressive it

I passed easily ,  3,64

I'm a math genius for that?

[Blue_Angel]

Winrate ; 3,16

not so impressive it

I passed easily ,  3,64

I'm a math genius for that?

I see you are top on that list, what bet did you use?

[Falkor2k15]

Winrate ; 3,16

not so impressive it

I passed easily ,  3,64

I'm a math genius for that?

You understand what those numbers mean? She tripled her money, whereas everyone else generally lost to the house edge.

[plolp]

I bet the maximum on a single number with his  4 splits and

his street

[plolp]

You understand what those numbers mean?

Yes : absolutely nothing

[Blue_Angel]

I bet the maximum on a single number with his  4 splits and

his street

in every spin?

[plolp]

No

[Azim]

Nick,

I noticed you haven't posted anythng on this thread since 2Aug2016.

I have a question:

Are you using the code from tracker that has been posted on reply #29.

If you are: 29, 22, 14, 28, 16  would that be a no bet?

4,5,6 is B,R,?
2,4,6 is B,B,?

Is there something I have missed to understand in the thread?

[Nickmsi]

Hi Azim . . .

Sorry I have not posted recently but Vic and I are trying to get my new bot released September 1st and I have to visit my Grandsons in Colorado for a week but always glad to answer your question.

You have 5 numbers (29,22,14,28,16  or BBRBR).

On the 6th spin there are 2 Arithmetic Progressions (AP) than can be formed:

4-5-6
2-4-6

The 4 and 5 are BR so 4-5-6 would not form an AP of either RRR or BBB

The 2 and 4 are BB so if the 6th spin is a B they would form an AP of 2-4-6

B B R B R B
1 2 3 4 5 6

So we would bet B to complete the AP of 2-4-6.


Hope this helps.

Cheers
Nick

[Azim]

Nick,

Thanks for the clarification. Thought you had given up on this.

One Last Question anyone:

I have these 3 numbers  1, 2, 22.

R  B  B
1   2  3

From the above AP of 2,3,4 is possible.

However BB is possible for a 3rd B so a bet is on B on spin 4 is that right?

[Bally6354]

Ok, you're still not seeing it.

VdW is not needed - at all.

3Nine is right. VDW can't help you right out of the box and it's pretty pointless in reality if you already have the framework in place to win. I suppose what I am saying is that you would pretty much already need to know how to win before you could come up with some convoluted way to use VDW. So what's the point? It's good in a sense however to stretch the old brain a bit.

[Falkor2k15]

Azim, check out the attached for a few examples of multi-directional VdW.

[Falkor2k15]

[Blue_Angel]

Well if someone doesn't have a real edge, this would be a progress for him/her.

[3Nine]

Exactly. Or, as I like to put it, chaos can be arranged.