Apologies if I've sent this to the wrong section but after reading various members comments referring to small targets, Bet Voyager, rigged RNG and switching strategies I hope it's of interest. I've recorded all 17 sessions so you can check them out.
When my program RouletteKeyGold was introduced to this Forum a few weeks ago. I suggested one should aim for a small target then stop.
Not everyone agreed. They said things like "its easy enough to say 'stop when you're winning' if it was that easy everyone would do it", "do I use my program or just sell or just sell it?"
I don't blame people for being sceptical so I decided to put my money where my mouse is
and double my starting capital.
In theory starting with $100 by session 21 one would have over $200. As follows
It may sound a bit far fetched could one double ones stake in 21 days just by aiming for 4% a day.?
I decided to test it and so I set myself a target of doubling a $100 bank within 21 days with a minimum of risk, I failed it didn't take 21, days but just 17!
I have recorded every session even my errors and these can be seen at http://roulettekeygold.com/latest.html
I wouldn't be happy selling a program I didn't believe in. It's all very well people putting up videos on YouTube but a couple of videos doesn't prove anything does it? I've published 17 consecutive videos, and I'm not just publicising it now I've reached my target some of my customers new what I was doing at the start. (I'm aware of the phrase "Don't do you good deeds when there's no-one watching you"). As far as I'm aware I'm the only person ever to publish 17 consecutive winning sessions (correct me if I'm wrong)
What I won't do is make any promises other than 'the longer you play the more likely you are to lose", if people want promises other sellers will tell you what you want to hear.
With an 8% target it would take 11 sessions to double up and after 21 days $447
I see nothing wrong with just 4% as by day 122 you could win over $10,000 ! and even if you only (!) gain half that have you really failed?
Other members have suggested switching techniques within a session and being satisfied with small regular wins. I agree and I've endeavoured to do this by switching techniques when the time is right. Most of the techniques aren't new, most are over 100 years old, what is new is my program which is basically a counter/calculator but it does identify when the time is right to switch.
To re-inforce this idea of Small Targets
in some professions they are called SMART (Small, Measurable, Realistic, Timed) targets.
My S.M.A.R.T target reads as follows
Small = 4%
Measurable - Simple Maths
Achievable - A couple of wins could achieve the target in most cases
Realistic - The stakes must be set in order to achieve the target
Timed - less than 60 spins (up to 1 hour at a live casino)
In the early sessions I play The Beginners System using $1 stakes on Doz1, Red & Odd. However, its not always possible to hit the target early on so I included other systems as suggested by RouletteKeyGold.
Thes systems include Neighbours, The Hidden Dozen, Finals, Prudential and Ex-Croupiers. You could use virtually any system I saw a list of 400 given away recently, some of them would work.
Obviously, it would take a mind like a computer to keep track of triggers for all these systems. But fortunately I have progammed RKG to keep track of six or so.
It has been suggested I sell the systems separately. In fact only two of the systems are mine and I've used 7 in this test and I wouldn't like to sell just one as every system goes awry sometimes. Even the beginners system as I show.
I've chosen to run this test at Bet Voyager no zero casino.
This is because I had some money in there as I'd just been checking I could withdraw it (after rumours on this Forum)
Instead of a zero Bet Voyager charge 10% every time you win a sitting. (I hope to pay them thousands!)
Another thing about this casino is that there are no free spins so I have to bet every spin, but I think that adds authenticity to the test.
It's also RNG which many of us are suspicious about. A few odd things happen but in Roulette the only thing to expect is the unexpected!
I admit I've made a few mistakes but it goes to show I'm human. Without the errors I could have won more!
If every session was perfect you'd have every right to be suspicious.
I've still got some more sums to do on the stakes, perhaps I could have increased the stakes towards the end of the trial. So instead of betting 50c I may have bet $1.
To reach my 4% target the lowest number of spins was 2, the highest about 60. This at a live casino would amount to between two minutes and one hour, but at a live casino I may have had difficulty placing 12 bets in time.
The stakes are decided by the size of the Bank and/or the minimum bet. But I have refrained from increasing stakes after a loss. My maximum loss was about £40.00 which was well covered by my starting bank of £95.00
On single numbers where I usually bet on 12 numbers its 50c per $100 so $6 a bet stopping after 3-5 bets.
On even chances and table dozens either $1 or 10c depending on the strength of signal (if any)