Got a question fellas. What do you think is the best way to bet ONE number per spin (not the same number)...... not using a progression?

What I mean is, up or down a unit after "X" number of no hits...... then maybe up or down a unit after a win etc. What is the best approach to this? (BR is not an issue).

Ken

 
See attach file ...

RWD has a chart in his book with betting scales and plateaus that you can use going up and down depending on the success you are having.

Here it is. It's in old money but can be easily converted.

The RWD way is betting for 9 spins. I noticed Mike McBain's suggestion is to go for 13.

[attachimg=1]

just tried this 3 times. Totally simple on RX...just play 30 and see what pops up


1. 27 only qualified (hit twice after showing 2 times more) out of 6....never showed
2. no qualified number ever hit again (stayed at one)
3. same as 2

I think Turbo did something called "another hot number test" I think its coded into RX somewhere.

Here is RWD's summary of 566 sessions.

He suggested to play 3 strings on a wheel and then quit if no winner.

So 1 means a win on the first string on spin 1.

LL1 means the first two strings lost and the third string won on spin 1.

These figures look almost too good to be true and old Roy may have been cooking the books 

But what I can say is that it was a popular foil for many savvy blackjack players down the years.

cheers

[attachimg=1]


[attachimg=2]

I have my bet selection already, not an issue. It's the HOW to do it is my problem.

Ken

Well there was somewhere code of that system in RX.. I should have it somewhere I think...

It sinks like a rock (with assumption that is coded correctly by the rules)

What is the problem? Why would this be better than anything else?

Drazen

Quote from: Drazen on October 29, 2013, 09:52:21 PM

What is the problem? Why would this be better than anything else?

Drazen

I have to agree. random within random within random.


If you isolate a "way"....like this one...where some event happens after some amount of times, those isolated evens are again random.


Its an illusion that you have found something random does. Random doesn't do anything. Its random


Its like seeing a perfect Horse shape in a cloud. it's a cloud. it isn't a Horse


Now..... you saw a Horse. You arnt going mad. It was there


Now predict which cloud will be the next to make a Horse shape.


Different story.

if you bet only 1 number at the time  you bet 1unit for 24 spins after that bet 2 units for 25spins and after that you bet 3 units for 24 spins if no hit stop the bet and start with 2 units for same cycles...

Apologies....Turbos hot number test was more than 1 number

Are the answers thus far answering your very specific question, Ken?

I like the idea of isolating a section of the wheel like the
area around zero(es) and betting a number when it shows.

Since you mention the bet selection jumping from one number to the next
you could target different hot spots of the wheel-or alternate between wheel and table bets.

"Are the answers thus far answering your very specific question" >>> Well, no.

This is what I was thinking, as of now >> Start out with "whatever" unit size. Every 30 spins without a win, up ONE unit.

On a win, down ONE unit but never going under the starting out unit size bet.


This I read years ago but I don't like it >> Every 30 spins without a win, up ONE unit AND with every win, up ONE unit. So, your unit sizes will never go down.

Ken

Well, Turbo said this >> 1) we are playing 5 numbers.
2) we increase +1 unit on all 5 numbers after any 5 spins
without a win.
3) we decrease -1 unit on all 5 numbers after any win.

So that's based on 5 numbers. So maybe for one number, I'll up it after 25 misses instead of 30. Him and I do agree, down a unit after any win.



Ken