Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Can someone spot the research done on occurance of repeaters?

Started by KingsRoulette, December 02, 2012, 10:53:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

KingsRoulette

Hey Friends,
      Long back there was a research done upon the occurance of repeaters. It was regarding which position has more chance to repeat, for example a number that has hit last, before last ............36th
                       I think it was done upon a million spins and it was observed that numbers that are at the distance of 9th to 13th repeat most.
      Can someone spot that research from rouletteforum.cc?
Nothing can perfectly beat a random session but luck. If someone claims perfection in every session, he is either a fool himself or think all to be fools.

Ralph

I think Bayes can answer, I stole this from him.


WAIT   FREQUENCY1         32412         64523         89234         109745         123586         126717         124408         116149         1009510       845411       691412       534913       377114       265915       181816       116117       69518       41319       20320       10921       4422       2123       1224       725       326       127       128       029       030       031       032       033       034       035       0

KingsRoulette

Nothing can perfectly beat a random session but luck. If someone claims perfection in every session, he is either a fool himself or think all to be fools.

Ralph

I do not remember the link, it is searchable, and that you can do as easy as me.


KingsRoulette

No. I think it was something else. In that research it was shown as to what gaps repeaters occur most. It was at 9th to 12th attempt, I think. How can no repeater come at 34th step in a million trials and I am talking of repeat of a single number and not the EC.
Nothing can perfectly beat a random session but luck. If someone claims perfection in every session, he is either a fool himself or think all to be fools.