Thank you Ralph for your fast and detailed reply.
How and where can i learn to code for your bot?
Thank you.

Quote from: KingsRoulette on December 11, 2012, 02:55:07 AM
Is it Random Pattern Breaker? Can you show the graph here?

[attach=1]
I will post it in more detail @ the thread you mentioned. It ends -183. But that is not the point. The objective was to get lowest fluctuation. More can be discussed after.

Quote from: Ralph on December 11, 2012, 04:03:00 AM

The bot can be coded for all kinds of play.  I use my self not all scripts in the bot. And I invite other to code as well, or come with suggestions.  I use to go better with inside bets. 2/3 betting I have had no success.  - I have a method for you If you have the time and the will, straight up numbers, so far in about 10000 spins (about 540 games) I am +8841


I have a session playing EC with 10000 spins which gained 1768 units.   - wow, progressions or flatbetting?

Quote from: soggett on December 11, 2012, 09:50:47 AM
I have a session playing EC with 10000 spins which gained 1768 units.   - wow, progressions or flatbetting?

I really did it using more than one method.
A:
1  first level     1,1,1,3,4  (or 2,2,2,4) and on a win you parlay. Reset on plus. using 0.01 chip


2 second level if first is a loss:  1,2,3,5,8 using 0.1 chip


On this level we do not parlay  on first loss bet the same again and if it win it cancel the previous loss, so stay and bet again the same.
If you win two times in a row we are ahead. and go to level 1 .Go to next step in progression if you lose twice.


It is abot 200 in risk.


I followed the last every spin.


B:
I did some play add one chip if you lose or win until new high.

Quote from: Ralph on December 11, 2012, 10:45:10 AM

I really did it using more than one method.
A:
1  first level     1,1,1,3,4  and on a win you parlay. Reset on plus. using 0.01 chip


2 second level if first is a loss:  1,2,3,5,8 using 0.1 chip


On this level we do not parlay  on first loss bet the same again and if it win it cancel the previous loss, so stay and bet again the same.
If you win two times in a row we are ahead. and go to level 1 .Go to next step in progression if you lose twice.


It is abot 200 in risk.


I followed the last every spin.


B:
I did some play add one chip if you lose or win until new high.

nice 
what was your biggest DD if you can remember?

Quote from: soggett on December 11, 2012, 11:23:25 AM

nice 
what was your biggest DD if you can remember?

I lost 200 units a couple of times, when losing up to the 8th step.

Quote from: Ralph on December 11, 2012, 11:36:16 AM

I lost 200 units a couple of times, when losing up to the 8th step.

did you restart everything when you lost 200?
that are great results

Quote from: soggett on December 11, 2012, 01:37:09 PM

did you restart everything when you lost 200?
that are great results

A session up to 8th step cost 200, then it is to take that loss and try again, we do not want to skyrocket the bets.

Quote from: MarignyGrilleau on December 11, 2012, 09:44:54 AM
Thank you Ralph for your fast and detailed reply.
How and where can i learn to code for your bot?
Thank you.

I have described how the bot wants the script in my section here.


I think my first post there.

Quote from: Ralph on December 11, 2012, 02:44:19 PM

A session up to 8th step cost 200, then it is to take that loss and try again, we do not want to skyrocket the bets.

Yeah, that's what I thought, no point going further down

Quote from: Ralph on December 11, 2012, 02:45:39 PM

I have described how the bot wants the script in my section here.


I think my first post there.

I am sorry i skipped it. 
Will take a look and try. Thank You.

Fellow members, I did some "off the record" tests of this system on dozens, to prepare ground for a new thread, like I said before.

Truth is this only works on dozens (columns) if your chosen dozen (column) performs close to the expected rate. If not, then the progression puts you in a deep hole, and believe me when i say deep !

Why ? Because adding one unit will not suffice when you have a bad run playing 2:1 odds. Simple as that. I should have seen it from a distance  .

Pardon the interruption, please do carry on.

This progression is nothing else but Oscar Grind and like every other progression it has its own set of limitations. It can't win till wins come close.

Quote from: KingsRoulette on December 17, 2012, 03:30:01 AM
This progression is nothing else but Oscar Grind and like every other progression it has its own set of limitations. It can't win till wins come close.

Yes, but Oscars grind on an EC I think is more risky. If the variance goes against the stakes goes out of control.  A straight up has more fluctations, but with hundreds of bets and most important a higher pay out makes it to recover with just a few lucky hits. We have to look at the different gaps between the hits, if they becomes narrow for a short time we can be back on track.  The progression on one straight up, is it a negative or positive? We add on win, but only if we need to catch up.

Quote from: Ralph on December 17, 2012, 05:36:07 AM

Yes, but Oscars grind on an EC I think is more risky. If the variance goes against the stakes goes out of control.  A straight up has more fluctations, but with hundreds of bets and most important a higher pay out makes it to recover with just a few lucky hits. We have to look at the different gaps between the hits, if they becomes narrow for a short time we can be back on track.  The progression on one straight up, is it a negative or positive? We add on win, but only if we need to catch up.

Everything is proportional : your risk, your rewards, your ultimate profit/loss and time to get there.