I came across this method from Izak ("lets talk winning")
a while ago.

The method, simple, is to bet 11 streets, winning 1 unit per spin.
That stripped down method seems a little harsh. But I have seen some
variations on this lately that are interesting.

Not knowing any better, when I first heard about it I tried it.
Real money. Real wheel. $10 per street. (Izak starts out by saying
to bet $100 per street, and win $100.) I won first spin. And lost
the 2nd spin at the time. Lost $110.

Now, looking at methods that have this slant for leverage, sometimes you
need to modify your perspective. There is a saying where, instead of grinding
nickles and dimes, just toss down a $1000 bet for one event and call it a day.
That is more the direction this leans. But I've encountered two more advocates
of this method.

So the other day  I went and played it.  The basis seems to point to looking
for a street to repeat in the last 6 streets, then bet against it. I more or less
bet against recent hits.

I made $5.50.  That's a lot of wins.

The zero didn't kill me. But odds are that you will get MANY more and consecutive
wins. If you get a zero and lose, you can recoup.  You could bet 1x the next spin
and recoup. It is highly unlikely that you will lose 2 in a row.

I am working with it, and it has no hard bounderies. But playing and managing
carefully, I think, has merit. You could recoup in parts.

But I thought I'd throw it out and get a conversation rolling. I've had both
experiences. Live.

You feel pretty confident winning with this. You've just gotta be ready to recoup
once in a while.

Thoughts?