The biggest wins come from winning.
The largest losses come from Losing.

Simply there are times you can win and times you cannot.

You can win because the cards are forming hands you expect, believe in, witnessed before and more. I just prefer to call that anticipations, with the '4's'.

PREDICTION
FORECAST
EXPECTING
HOPE

You cannot win because the cards are forming hands you do not expect, believe in, never witnessed before and more or you seriously do not think will happen and more.

Extreme focus, no emotion on losing hands and risk only the risk capital buy in which is a percentage of your bank roll. Do not keep buying in and do not keep chasing or engaging in other wild fallacies of just getting even, because most likely you'll drain your bank roll and you then engage yourself in the extremely unfair chance of getting even, never mind making a profit for the session.

Now, once again I push the M.M.M. techniques that I have preached, because they will truly manage your wins and playtime if you absolutely follow them. I have found countless times that there is a huge advantage you afford yourself for wagering according to my M.M.M., with your win money/profit for many reasons.

If you regularly wager a negative press progression (Marty) or you believe flat-betting will lead to recovery and/or profitability, you might as well skip all of this and get into a casino and make your large amounts of money. You will then be accomplishing what has been attempted trillions of times, and simply does not and has never worked more than a session here or there.

But if you really desire to find a decent wagering method that has control built into it, the following has done extremely well for me over the past years.

1-3-2-6 or 1-3-2-4.  Coupled with my 1/3rd, 1/3rd, 1/3rd, application of your separated wins and playing that out.

One final thought. Something else you must realize and use to your advantage. The mind plays tricks, the mind invents things and you believe them as actually happening or happened in the past. Think about it and think hard.

Apply yourself with advantages and be smart.

Thanks for reading.

Nice post!

I have an idea in order to lower the unit disboursement.
Instead of using full amounts, why not adding a proportional percentage your Plan dictates?
So instead of 3, let's add a 30%,  20% for 2 and so on.
Now your bets are:
$100, $130, $120 and $160.

Imo surviving takes a primary role over the urge of winning fast.


as.

Good day to all my bac comrades

alrelax
in part
"...But if you really desire to find a decent wagering method that has control built into it, the following has done extremely well for me over the past years.

1-3-2-6 or 1-3-2-4.  Coupled with my 1/3rd, 1/3rd, 1/3rd, application of your separated wins and playing that out...."

In my mind the following is the absolute most important. Because we will all win some and lose some regardless of our chosen wagering regime. The wagering regimes are as varied as the players:
1/3rd, 1/3rd, 1/3rd, application of your separated wins and playing that out.
that's the Bottomline regardless of our chosen wagering regime. In other words doNOT rebet all of our win monies back through. Only win our won money once.

ABG:
in part
"...I have an idea in order to lower the unit disboursement.
Instead of using full amounts, why not adding a proportional percentage your Plan dictates?
So instead of 3, let's add a 30%,  20% for 2 and so on.
Now your bets are:
$100, $130, $120 and $160.

Imo surviving takes a primary role over the urge of winning fast. ..."

ABG--i agree with your proposal IF ones goal is to "survive". I think the key is "What is ones objective". re: survival--albalaha did a lot of research in this area and many of his post in past couple years would lean toward your suggestion(pressing/regressing a much smaller %), which indeed will help one "survive". For those interested just search the forum as he (albalaha) was nice enough to share years of research in this area of study (i.e., surviving huge swings in Variance)

My opinion differs a little from asymbacguy general suggestion above as although I do indeed want to survive and give myself a fair number of attempts. I also know that I will easily see (-2SD or +2SD) sway in results in my average session size of decisions. My objective leans more toward: If I see (say -2.5-- -3.5SD-- 5SD,...etc) then my buyin is being stressed and I will bust (but only lose ONE buyin). However,if (when) I am fortunate enough to see lets say >= +1.5SD-- +2.5SD , then I will make >= 1.0 buyins and maybe even >3-5 buyins occasionally , on a single buyin .

It obviously is nice when I receive the latter scenario prior to the first.

To each their own

Continued Success,kfb

"Only win our won money once"