I'm with Turner on this one. I honestly don't understand why you would want investors if you are winning without any problems -- so far.

Why would you want to play with other peoples money, knowing that you would have to explain to them when it has a bad day, why would you add that extra pressure.

I just don't get it, sorry mate

Quote from: Superman on January 10, 2014, 12:05:25 PM
I honestly don't understand why you would want investors if you are winning without any problems -- so far.

I suppose one reason might be that he wants to increase the stakes but doesn't want to risk his own money. 


Alternatively, it's a simple Ponzi: Weddings will get as many "investors" as possible and operate it like a pyramid scheme before disappearing into thin air. 


If he's confident, then he shouldn't object to a simple challenge; give him some spins and let's see how the system performs. If it does as well as he claims it shouldn't take too long to get some statistically significant results. 

Quote from: Superman on January 10, 2014, 12:05:25 PM
I'm with Turner on this one. I honestly don't understand why you would want investors if you are winning without any problems -- so far.

Why would you want to play with other peoples money, knowing that you would have to explain to them when it has a bad day, why would you add that extra pressure.

I just don't get it, sorry mate

Actually what I want is to help those who are interested in an extra income. Roulette has been an additional income for me. I wouldn't be doing this if I am not confident. This thread is just an open text requested by Vic to see the public opinion. If the demand is not there then the proposal will be discontinued.

I do ask myself the same thing why do this when people are gonna question me. I thought of this proposal so I can help people without compromising my system. Before the problem was, if I were to play my system on the clients bv account the ip would be an issue.

Weddings,


Don't take offence at my questions, of course you don't have to answer them (and you haven't). All I'm saying is that you wouldn't be the first to mistake a good run of luck for a consistent winner. It's Vic's forum and ultimately he has the final say.

Thanks. The reason I asked how long you've been playing in terms of the number of placed bets is because just giving a time doesn't mean much; if you only place 50 bets per week it wouldn't be as reliable a result as if you'd played 500 - see what I mean?
Its more than 500 bets of cause, so much that I have lost count.

So you're playing at BV - is that the live wheel? if so you can't have played much because they've only just opened it.
BV RNG. I hae said before, if you can beat BV RNG you can beat any wheel.

I don't mean for this to sound like an inquisition, it's just that I'm guessing any potential "investor" would be happier with a long track record rather than a short one, and if you're only playing 2-4 numbers on average it takes a lot more placed bets to give some indication of consistency than if you're playing 18 or 24 numbers.
1 number bets win often too. I did test runs with some of the members here before.

This sounds very  fishy at the first.

You didn't mentioned possibility of losing at all  so some money back guarantee in case of "magical" lost is possible I presume? 

I must say that if someone gives money to a person who says it can ennoble it on roulette without any actual proof (few winning sessions doesn't prove anything) and without above conditioned in contract, is total ..... for me.


Drazen

Just the last week's play.






Anyway looks like most of you are against it so no point in continuing this anyway

Weddings

Here is how it strikes me. 

A person winning as you are could amass a huge bankroll in very little time.  He could make large bets and clean up.  Why would this person need investors?

Secondly............

If you have a lot of investors and start making huge bets and winning huge amounts--well, I strongly suspect you will be banned for some reason or another.  These casinos aren't going to just sit still and watch someone win huge amounts daily.  Would you?

Anyway........

You're making a killing.  Don't worry; be happy!

Sam

No, iam not saying that.
Off course it can go wrong anytime anyhow....

But if ones buys into something should he or she have the right to know what he is buying into....






Carlitos 

Weddings,


Thanks for the replies. I don't think "most of us" are against it (BTW, I've removed ND's post - unsubstantiated accusations aren't needed), and even if they were it wouldn't prove anything one way or the other.


As I said, I've no objections and we're still waiting on one mod's approval.


It's up to individual members to decide whether they want to take the risk. If they're sensible, they'll keep the investment small to begin with.


Let's leave it at that for now. Any more needless criticisms or attacks against weddings will be deleted.

Weddings.....


Have to agree with Samster.....Casino will notice you have won a lot....and now you seem to be winning a whole lot more (especially online)I do have one question that I can't see answered (sorry if I missed your answer)Is this being played on RNG?personally, I think Bayes idea of playing a challenge would be great marketing for you....like a case study.


Just my view. Not intended to muddy any waters.

Thanks Bayes. I understand that everyone has their doubts against this as it is something that is new and one of a kind. This is the internet we know haters are everywhere, my bullet proof vest is on:)


I already said this in the beginning, this is for members who are interested, not forcing anyone here.

Quote from: Turner on January 10, 2014, 05:19:24 PM
Weddings.....


Have to agree with Samster.....Casino will notice you have won a lot....and now you seem to be winning a whole lot more (especially online)I do have one question that I can't see answered (sorry if I missed your answer)Is this being played on RNG?personally, I think Bayes idea of playing a challenge would be great marketing for you....like a case study.


Just my view. Not intended to muddy any waters.

I have answered that, BV's RNG. Yes I was told that BV has a restriction in the money you can withdraw rather than banning you. My focus in future will be on redbet which is one of the top casinos reviewed at casinomeister. Why redbet?
-Free spins, no 0.01 dummy bets
-Pays in 24 hours
-Faster spins compared to BV
-No disconnection errors

Thanks Weddings....


RNG is a contentious issue. Could be a deal breaker for many. Who knows?


Good luck.

Quote from: Turner on January 10, 2014, 05:19:24 PM
Weddings.....


Have to agree with Samster.....Casino will notice you have won a lot....


Right....lately/since raised my chips on DB/been regulary disconnected throughout the play,mostly
on winning bets.....is that a bad sign ?