BetSelection.cc

Please login or register.

Topic: ACETF BET  (Read 19516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carlitos

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: ACETF BET
« Reply #45 on: April 03, 2016, 03:51:31 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • ACETF - FTECA - Follow The Even Changes Always  :o ???  :)




    Carlitos  8)


    Offline 6th-sense

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 103
      • View Profile
    Re: ACETF BET
    « Reply #46 on: April 04, 2016, 06:11:24 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • ACETF --Always chase evens that follow  :thumbsup:

    Offline Carlitos

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 174
      • View Profile
    Re: ACETF BET
    « Reply #47 on: April 04, 2016, 08:06:53 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • .....just one thing...always do the opposite..... ACETF - FTECA  ;)



    Carlitos  8)

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: ACETF BET
    « Reply #48 on: April 07, 2016, 08:26:54 pm »
  • ReplyReply
  • Yes there are various theories on acronyms and hidden signs.  If you are the creator and you are laying a trail with links then this could be fun but from the searcher's point of view this can be frustrating if there are deliberately false signals. However just because there is a title does not necessarily mean anything. For example consider A-CET ( www.A-CET.org) and what that means. Is there a link or was it set to further cloud the issue over worthwhile causes? The jury is still out. Or ACET, or ACET International.


    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: ACETF BET
    « Reply #49 on: April 08, 2016, 04:44:57 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • I am convinced more than ever that there are numerous CWB discoveries to be made, and right now I am working on one that uses cluster phenomena and outside table bets. It is a matter of where you choose to look and give attention for focus. My goal is still to achieve access to this and others during 2016.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: ACETF BET
    « Reply #50 on: April 14, 2016, 12:00:44 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Considerable progress has been made by me in researching a suitable consistent and 'simple' bet using outside table bets. I think I have been fortunate in avoiding some of the hundreds of hours of research some of my colleagues apply. It is like scientific study though and the scientific method and complete integrity is needed in research and in communication/ sharing of data.

    I  am convinced that sometimes the answers and clues to those answers are to be found right under our noses. Sometimes to look in a fresh way at what is familiar gives rewards. I know a year ago I never dreamed of looking at session ratios for output of dozens and columns, and EC options. Now in looking through this material I have found important information that can be a key component in building your own unique bet framework. There are many paths to take and because I am an experienced live player, I want bet characteristics that are easily managed in live scenarios whether on a screen with rapid roulette ( faster but more private with the handy 'repeat' button) or table roulette where play is much slower and inter-action with other players is sometimes necessary ( more of a hindrance than a help).

    I love the phrase used by Gizmotron where he refers to the casino outputs sometimes performing like ATM's. To have a style of play and method that can tap these fertile cycles is essential, and also at other times to be still and patient.

    Offline XXVV

    • Moderator
    • *****
    • Posts: 1624
    • Gender: Male
    • Legio XX Valeria Victrix LVX
      • View Profile
    Re: ACETF BET
    « Reply #51 on: April 24, 2016, 03:00:22 am »
  • ReplyReply
  • Testing is necessary over an extended period and with data from a wide variety of sources to avoid the dangers of reverse engineering and self delusion. CEH was right in suggesting at least 30 samples of 100 spin tests with a positive outcome in at least 28 of those samples as a first priority. Of course 3000 spins is still a small sample, and in my view there should be 10 sets of 30 samples as an ideal benchmark with sourcing from ten different live casinos. I do not consider randomly generated data suitable and would rather I personally sourced the live spin data.

    In my own library I have data from Ritz London, Sky Casino Auckland, Christchurch Casino, Hamburg, Wiesbaden, Baden Baden, Sydney Star City, Jupiters Casino Queensland, Dublin Fitzwilliam, Queenstown Sky City NZ.

    In recent observation of the remarkable work in VR8 and Hexagon I note the wisdom of being able to read/ respond to outcomes sufficiently quickly to shut down live play when a trend pattern is broken and while a new trend is forming live play should be halted. This can be done on internet live casinos where very smart programs can assist the player, but in live play I am interested only in play without any technical assistance. Therefore it is essential to add to play efficiency that corrective phases are mitigated. Such player discretion is improved with experience and it may be that earlier tests of a potential CWB must be sufficiently powerful to handle the correction waves and the 100 spin samples will encounter such from time to time, and therefore must be able to deal with such. It is anticipated therefore that in real time play results can be further improved.

    I hope to be able to publish some results soon of my own work in one such field.